TSTP Solution File: SWV244-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 1 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oanalz(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
| c_in(X,c_union(U,Y,Z),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
| c_in(X,c_union(Y,U,Z),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_union(Y,Z,U),U)
| c_in(X,Z,U)
| c_in(X,Y,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(10,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_0,cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_1,cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(12,plain,
c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnE_0,cls_conjecture_0]),10]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_union(X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_0,12]) ).
cnf(26,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,16]) ).
cnf(27,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[11,26]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:16:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 "."
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T18:16:19
% 0.20/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n020.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T18:16:19
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 #||
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 ||#
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.51 ; 53 formulas have been input or derived (from 12 formulas).
% 0.20/0.51 ; 27 (51%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.20/0.51 ; 3 (11%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.51 ; 24 (89%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.51 ;
% 0.20/0.51 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.002 7% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Assert (6 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.003 10% Process new row (37 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.002 7% Resolution (22 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (11 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (2 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Forward simplification (37 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Backward simplification (27 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.020 69% Other
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.029 Total
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.032 Real time
% 0.20/0.51 ;
% 0.20/0.51 ; Term-hash-array has 57 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 entries (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 10 nodes (10 at peak, 10 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 1 possibly forward subsuming row in 4 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 1 possibly backward subsumed row in 4 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Path-index has 57 entries (60 at peak, 61 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Path-index has 181 nodes (184 at peak, 185 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Trie-index has 57 entries (60 at peak, 61 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Trie-index has 234 nodes (247 at peak, 252 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 11 generalization terms in 43 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 25 instance terms in 22 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 240 unifiable terms in 98 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ;
% 0.20/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.20/0.51 ; 4 with value 16
% 0.20/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to give has 13 entries:
% 0.20/0.51 ; 1 with value (4 12) 4 with value (4 16) 1 with value (4 29)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 5 with value (4 14) 2 with value (4 23)
% 0.20/0.51 Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.51 0.032 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.51 0.028794 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.51 0.002814 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.51 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.51 0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.51 2,198,472 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.51 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T18:16:19
% 0.20/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.51 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------