TSTP Solution File: SWV244-2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:19:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:09:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.20/0.38 #
% 0.20/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.38 # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6
% 0.20/0.38 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.20/0.38 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.20/0.38 # Hello from C++
% 0.20/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.20/0.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.20/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.20/0.38 # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.20/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.20/0.38 # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.20/0.38 # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.20/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.20/0.38 # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.20/0.38 # 4 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.20/0.38 # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.20/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.20/0.38 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.20/0.38 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X2,X4))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_in(X1,X2,X3)|c_in(X1,X4,X3)|~c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3))).
% 0.20/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # Found 4 steps
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),X5,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),X5,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_33, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X2,X4))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_in(X1,X2,X3)|c_in(X1,X4,X3)|~c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3))).
% 0.20/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # Found 4 steps
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_33, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X2,X4))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_in(X1,X2,X3)|c_in(X1,X4,X3)|~c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3))).
% 0.20/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # Found 4 steps
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_union(X5,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X5,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_33, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X2,X4))).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_in(X1,X2,X3)|c_in(X1,X4,X3)|~c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3))).
% 0.20/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # Found 4 steps
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.20/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~c_in(v_X,c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_34, ...])).
% 0.20/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.38 # Child (31991) has found a proof.
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.20/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------