TSTP Solution File: SWV244-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.63s 1.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 9 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 25 ( 14 ~; 11 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 4 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 (; 28 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_union > #nlpp > c_Message_Osynth > c_Message_Oanalz > v_X > v_H > v_G > tc_Message_Omsg
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(v_X,type,
v_X: $i ).
tff(v_G,type,
v_G: $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oanalz,type,
c_Message_Oanalz: $i > $i ).
tff(c_Message_Osynth,type,
c_Message_Osynth: $i > $i ).
tff(c_in,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(tc_Message_Omsg,type,
tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).
tff(c_union,type,
c_union: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_H,type,
v_H: $i ).
tff(f_38,axiom,
! [V_c,V_B,T_a,V_A] :
( ~ c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)
| c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_33,axiom,
! [V_X,V_H] :
( ~ c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_43,axiom,
! [V_c,V_A,T_a,V_B] :
( ~ c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)
| c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_28,axiom,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_26,axiom,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_50,axiom,
! [V_c,V_A,V_B,T_a] :
( ~ c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a)
| c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)
| c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
! [V_c_3,V_A_6,V_B_4,T_a_5] :
( c_in(V_c_3,c_union(V_A_6,V_B_4,T_a_5),T_a_5)
| ~ c_in(V_c_3,V_B_4,T_a_5) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
! [V_X_1,V_H_2] :
( c_in(V_X_1,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H_2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(V_X_1,V_H_2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
! [V_c_7,V_A_8,V_B_10,T_a_9] :
( c_in(V_c_7,c_union(V_A_8,V_B_10,T_a_9),T_a_9)
| ~ c_in(V_c_7,V_A_8,T_a_9) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).
tff(c_23,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_4]) ).
tff(c_40,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_23]) ).
tff(c_47,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_40]) ).
tff(c_22,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_4]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).
tff(c_24,plain,
! [V_c_25,V_A_26,T_a_27,V_B_28] :
( c_in(V_c_25,V_A_26,T_a_27)
| c_in(V_c_25,V_B_28,T_a_27)
| ~ c_in(V_c_25,c_union(V_A_26,V_B_28,T_a_27),T_a_27) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).
tff(c_36,plain,
( c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_24]) ).
tff(c_49,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_47,c_22,c_36]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 23:00:56 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.63/1.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.67/1.63
% 2.67/1.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.67/1.67
% 2.67/1.67 Inference rules
% 2.67/1.67 ----------------------
% 2.67/1.67 #Ref : 0
% 2.67/1.67 #Sup : 8
% 2.67/1.67 #Fact : 0
% 2.67/1.67 #Define : 0
% 2.67/1.67 #Split : 0
% 2.67/1.67 #Chain : 0
% 2.67/1.67 #Close : 0
% 2.67/1.67
% 2.67/1.67 Ordering : KBO
% 2.67/1.67
% 2.67/1.67 Simplification rules
% 2.67/1.67 ----------------------
% 2.67/1.67 #Subsume : 0
% 2.67/1.67 #Demod : 0
% 2.67/1.67 #Tautology : 2
% 2.67/1.67 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 2.67/1.67 #BackRed : 0
% 2.67/1.67
% 2.67/1.67 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.67/1.67 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.67/1.67
% 2.67/1.67 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.67/1.67 ----------------------
% 2.67/1.67 Preprocessing : 0.42
% 2.67/1.67 Parsing : 0.23
% 2.67/1.67 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.67/1.67 Main loop : 0.17
% 2.67/1.67 Inferencing : 0.08
% 2.67/1.67 Reduction : 0.04
% 2.67/1.67 Demodulation : 0.03
% 2.67/1.67 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.67/1.67 Subsumption : 0.04
% 2.67/1.67 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.67/1.67 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.67/1.67 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.67/1.67 Total : 0.64
% 2.67/1.67 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.67/1.67 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.67/1.67 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.67/1.67 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------