%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV243-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 30.35s 30.55s
% Output   : Refutation 30.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   0 equ;   1 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    equal(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(u,v,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(u),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(u),v,tc_Message_Omsg))),
    file('SWV243-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ equal(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(v_H))),
    file('SWV243-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2643,axiom,
    equal(c_union(u,c_emptyset,v),u),
    file('SWV243-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(68464,plain,
    equal(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(u),c_Message_Osynth(u),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(u),c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg))),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2643,2]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:2643.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(68489,plain,
    equal(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(u),c_Message_Osynth(u),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(u))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2643,68464]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:2643.0,68464.0')] ).

cnf(68490,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[68489,4]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:68489.0,4.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV243-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 23:49:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 30.35/30.55  
% 30.35/30.55  SPASS V 3.9 
% 30.35/30.55  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 30.35/30.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 30.35/30.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 30.35/30.55  SPASS derived 53160 clauses, backtracked 53 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 12584 clauses.
% 30.35/30.55  SPASS allocated 120157 KBytes.
% 30.35/30.55  SPASS spent	0:0:29.18 on the problem.
% 30.35/30.55  		0:00:00.21 for the input.
% 30.35/30.55  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 30.35/30.55  		0:00:01.16 for inferences.
% 30.35/30.55  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 30.35/30.55  		0:0:26.78 for the reduction.
% 30.35/30.55  
% 30.35/30.55  
% 30.35/30.55  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 6 :
% 30.35/30.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 30.35/30.55  Formulae used in the proof : cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_Set_OUn__empty__right_0
% 30.35/30.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------