TSTP Solution File: SWV242-2 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SWV242-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:31:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X0,X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__upper1_0) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X1,X0,X2),tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__upper2_0) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
| c_lessequals(X0,X3,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0) ).
cnf(c_168,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(v_G,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_169,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_269,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_168]) ).
cnf(c_326,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_169]) ).
cnf(c_537,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_326,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_542,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_537,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_554,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_542]) ).
cnf(c_555,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_554,c_53]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : SWV242-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 09:08:17 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.48/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.48/1.18 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.48/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.48/1.18 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 clauses 7
% 0.48/1.18 conjectures 3
% 0.48/1.18 EPR 0
% 0.48/1.18 Horn 7
% 0.48/1.18 unary 4
% 0.48/1.18 binary 2
% 0.48/1.18 lits 11
% 0.48/1.18 lits eq 0
% 0.48/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 0.48/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.48/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 0.48/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.48/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------
% 0.48/1.18 Current options:
% 0.48/1.18 ------
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------