TSTP Solution File: SWV242-2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SWV242-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:44:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 23 ~; 16 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f17,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f2,f6,f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f14,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0) ).
fof(f14,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X4] : c_lessequals(X2,c_union(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__upper1_0) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f10,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f9,f4]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_G,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( c_lessequals(X2,X5,tc_set(X4))
| ~ c_lessequals(X3,X5,tc_set(X4))
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X3,tc_set(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f7,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X4] : c_lessequals(X3,c_union(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__upper2_0) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV242-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:17:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 % (21809)dis+1011_3:29_av=off:awrs=decay:awrsf=32:bce=on:drc=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:nwc=2.0:spb=goal_then_units:updr=off:urr=ec_only:i=29:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/29Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (21801)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)Time elapsed: 0.094 s
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 % (21809)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 % (21794)Success in time 0.149 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------