TSTP Solution File: SWV242-2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV242-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(u),c_Message_Oanalz(v),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('SWV242-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    c_lessequals(u,c_union(u,v,w),tc_set(w)),
    file('SWV242-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    c_lessequals(u,c_union(v,u,w),tc_set(w)),
    file('SWV242-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(w))
    | ~ c_lessequals(v,x,tc_set(w))
    | c_lessequals(u,x,tc_set(w)) ),
    file('SWV242-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('SWV242-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('SWV242-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('SWV242-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),u,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(v_H,u,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,4]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.0,4.1')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),u,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(v_G,u,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,4]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,4.1')] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,u,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(u),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,13]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.1,13.0')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_H_H,u,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(u),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,10]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.1,10.0')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[14,7]),
    [iquote('0:Res:14.1,7.0')] ).

cnf(37,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[35,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:35.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(38,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_H_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,37]),
    [iquote('0:Res:17.1,37.0')] ).

cnf(40,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[38,3]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:38.0,3.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem  : SWV242-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.15  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 22:03:30 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.44  
% 0.24/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.24/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.24/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.24/0.44  SPASS derived 29 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 32 clauses.
% 0.24/0.44  SPASS allocated 63123 KBytes.
% 0.24/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.24/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.24/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.24/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.24/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.24/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.24/0.44  
% 0.24/0.44  
% 0.24/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 15 :
% 0.24/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0 cls_Set_OUn__upper1_0 cls_Set_OUn__upper2_0 cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_conjecture_1 cls_conjecture_2
% 0.24/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------