TSTP Solution File: SWV242-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV242-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWV242-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 22:00:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Wed Jun 15 22:00:54 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9542.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35 in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.37 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.37 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.37 number of clauses in intial UL: 3
% 0.12/0.37 number of clauses initially in problem: 7
% 0.12/0.37 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 42
% 0.12/0.37 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.37 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.37 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.12/0.37 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.12/0.37 distinct function count: 3
% 0.12/0.37 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.07 sec ----> 187 [hyper,152,1,51] {-} $F.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 2.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 1 [] {+} -c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))| -c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.18/0.44 2 [] {+} -c_lessequals(A,B,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(A),c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.18/0.44 3 [] {+} -c_lessequals(A,B,tc_set(C))| -c_lessequals(D,A,tc_set(C))|c_lessequals(D,B,tc_set(C)).
% 0.18/0.44 4 [] {-} c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.18/0.44 5 [] {-} c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.18/0.44 6 [] {+} c_lessequals(A,c_union(A,B,C),tc_set(C)).
% 0.18/0.44 7 [] {+} c_lessequals(A,c_union(B,A,C),tc_set(C)).
% 0.18/0.44 11 [hyper,6,2] {+} c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(A),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.18/0.44 16 [hyper,7,2] {+} c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(A),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(B,A,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.18/0.44 51 [hyper,11,3,4] {-} c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,A,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.18/0.44 152 [hyper,16,3,5] {-} c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(A,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.18/0.44 187 [hyper,152,1,51] {-} $F.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.44 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 ============ end of search ============
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 true clauses given 6 (22.2%)
% 0.18/0.44 false clauses given 21
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 FALSE TRUE
% 0.18/0.44 9 1 0
% 0.18/0.44 11 4 0
% 0.18/0.44 12 2 18
% 0.18/0.44 13 10 8
% 0.18/0.44 14 0 24
% 0.18/0.44 15 0 24
% 0.18/0.44 16 0 16
% 0.18/0.44 17 0 40
% 0.18/0.44 tot: 17 130 (88.4% true)
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Process 9542 finished Wed Jun 15 22:00:54 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------