TSTP Solution File: SWV241-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWV241-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 15 ~; 22 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 29 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f114,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f93,f113]) ).
fof(f113,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f112,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f108,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f108,plain,
( c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f99,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f99,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f90,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__trans_0) ).
fof(f90,plain,
( c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f88]) ).
fof(f88,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f92,f88]) ).
fof(f92,plain,
c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f81,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f81,plain,
( c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f5,f72]) ).
fof(f72,plain,
v_X = c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f68,f8]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
( c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| v_X = c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f33,f6]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) = X0 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f21,f2]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( c_lessequals(c_insert(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_Message_Omsg) = X3 ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( c_lessequals(c_insert(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_Message_Omsg) = X3
| c_lessequals(c_insert(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f13,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f5,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,X2),X1,X2)
| c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,X2) = X0
| c_lessequals(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,tc_set(X2)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X5] :
( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X5,X7,X6),X5,X6)
| c_lessequals(X5,X7,tc_set(X6)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X3,X6,X4,X5] :
( ~ c_in(X3,c_insert(X4,X5,X6),X6)
| c_in(X3,X5,X6)
| X3 = X4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X5] :
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X5,X7,X6),X7,X6)
| c_lessequals(X5,X7,tc_set(X6)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWV241-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:05:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.49 % (22083)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (22088)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (22081)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (22088)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.50 TRYING [1]
% 0.18/0.51 % (22096)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.18/0.51 TRYING [2]
% 0.18/0.51 TRYING [3]
% 0.18/0.52 % (22085)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 TRYING [4]
% 0.18/0.52 % (22086)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.52
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)Time elapsed: 0.104 s
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.52 % (22088)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.52 % (22080)Success in time 0.179 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------