TSTP Solution File: SWV240-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV240-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.52s 8.70s
% Output : Refutation 8.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 5 unt; 2 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(u),c_Message_Oanalz(v),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(w),c_Message_Oanalz(x),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(u,w,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v,x,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('SWV240-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('SWV240-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(112,axiom,
( c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(w))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(u,v,w),u,w) ),
file('SWV240-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(113,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(u,v,w),v,w)
| c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(w)) ),
file('SWV240-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(115,axiom,
c_lessequals(u,u,tc_set(v)),
file('SWV240-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(1380,axiom,
( ~ c_in(u,v,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(u,c_Message_Oanalz(v),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('SWV240-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(1412,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,3]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.2,3.0')] ).
cnf(1414,plain,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1412,115]),
[iquote('0:MRR:1412.0,115.0')] ).
cnf(1841,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(u,c_Message_Oanalz(v),tc_Message_Omsg),v,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_lessequals(u,c_Message_Oanalz(v),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1380,113]),
[iquote('0:Res:1380.1,113.0')] ).
cnf(17334,plain,
( c_lessequals(u,c_Message_Oanalz(u),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(u,c_Message_Oanalz(u),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[112,1841]),
[iquote('0:Res:112.1,1841.0')] ).
cnf(17348,plain,
c_lessequals(u,c_Message_Oanalz(u),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17334]),
[iquote('0:Obv:17334.0')] ).
cnf(17349,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[17348,1414]),
[iquote('0:UnC:17348.0,1414.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV240-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:14:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 8.52/8.70
% 8.52/8.70 SPASS V 3.9
% 8.52/8.70 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 8.52/8.70 % SZS status Theorem
% 8.52/8.70 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.52/8.70 SPASS derived 13084 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 7154 clauses.
% 8.52/8.70 SPASS allocated 91873 KBytes.
% 8.52/8.70 SPASS spent 0:00:08.07 on the problem.
% 8.52/8.70 0:00:00.09 for the input.
% 8.52/8.70 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 8.52/8.70 0:00:00.28 for inferences.
% 8.52/8.70 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 8.52/8.70 0:00:07.32 for the reduction.
% 8.52/8.70
% 8.52/8.70
% 8.52/8.70 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 12 :
% 8.52/8.70 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 8.52/8.70 Formulae used in the proof : cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 cls_Set_OsubsetI_1 cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0
% 8.52/8.70
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------