TSTP Solution File: SWV232+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SWV232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 15:10:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.44s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Sep  4 02:02:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.13/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.13/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.44  tff(tptp_fun_D_13_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     tptp_fun_D_13: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(succ_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     succ: $i > $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(tptp_minus_1_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     tptp_minus_1: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(tptp_fun_C_14_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     tptp_fun_C_14: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(leq_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(a_select2_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     a_select2: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(rho_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     rho: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(n2_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     n2: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(n0_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     n0: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(n1_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     n1: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(a_select3_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     a_select3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(q_ds1_filter_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     q_ds1_filter: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(n5_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44     n5: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(1,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      ((~((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C!14) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D!13) & leq(C!14, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D!13, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))))))) <=> (~((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C!14) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D!13) & leq(C!14, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D!13, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))))))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(2,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      ((~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D) & leq(C, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))))))) <=> (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D) & leq(C, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))))))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(3,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      ((~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2))))) <=> (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D) & leq(C, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))))))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(4,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      ((~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2))))) <=> (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2)))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(5,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      ((~(![A: $i, B: $i] : ((((leq(n0, A) & leq(n0, B)) & leq(A, n5)) & leq(B, n5)) => (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, A, B) = a_select3(q_ds1_filter, B, A))) => ![C: $i, D: $i] : ((((leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D)) & leq(C, n2)) & leq(D, n2)) => ((((((((((((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D)))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C)))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D)))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D)))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C)))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D)))) & (n0 = D)) & (n1 = C)) & (n1 = D)) & (n2 = C)) => (a_select2(rho, n1) = n0))))) <=> (~((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~(leq(n0, A) & leq(n0, B) & leq(A, n5) & leq(B, n5))) | (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, A, B) = a_select3(q_ds1_filter, B, A)))) | ![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2))))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(6,axiom,(~(![A: $i, B: $i] : ((((leq(n0, A) & leq(n0, B)) & leq(A, n5)) & leq(B, n5)) => (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, A, B) = a_select3(q_ds1_filter, B, A))) => ![C: $i, D: $i] : ((((leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D)) & leq(C, n2)) & leq(D, n2)) => ((((((((((((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D)))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C)))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D)))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D)))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C)))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D)))) & (n0 = D)) & (n1 = C)) & (n1 = D)) & (n2 = C)) => (a_select2(rho, n1) = n0))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','quaternion_ds1_symm_0841')).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(7,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      (~((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~(leq(n0, A) & leq(n0, B) & leq(A, n5) & leq(B, n5))) | (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, A, B) = a_select3(q_ds1_filter, B, A)))) | ![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2)))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 5])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(8,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[7])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(9,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 4])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(10,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 4])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(11,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, n1) = n0) | (~((~((n0 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n0 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n0 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n1 = D))) & (~((n1 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (~((n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) & (~((n2 = C) & (n2 = D))) & (n0 = D) & (n1 = C) & (n1 = D) & (n2 = C))) | (~(leq(n0, C) & leq(n0, D) & leq(C, n2) & leq(D, n2))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 4])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(12,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D) & leq(C, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[11, 3])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(13,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D) & leq(C, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))))))),
% 0.21/0.44      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 2])).
% 0.21/0.44  tff(14,plain,
% 0.21/0.44      (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D) & leq(C, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))))))),
% 0.21/0.45      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 2])).
% 0.21/0.45  tff(15,plain,
% 0.21/0.45      (~![C: $i, D: $i] : ((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D) & leq(C, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))))))),
% 0.21/0.45      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[14, 2])).
% 0.21/0.45  tff(16,plain,(
% 0.21/0.45      ~((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C!14) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D!13) & leq(C!14, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D!13, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))))))),
% 0.21/0.45      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[15])).
% 0.21/0.45  tff(17,plain,
% 0.21/0.45      (~((a_select2(rho, succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = succ(tptp_minus_1)) | (~((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) | (~(leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), C!14) & leq(succ(tptp_minus_1), D!13) & leq(C!14, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))) & leq(D!13, succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)))))))),
% 0.21/0.45      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[16, 1])).
% 0.21/0.45  tff(18,plain,
% 0.21/0.45      ((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (~((succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) & (~((succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = D!13))) & (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = C!14) & (succ(succ(tptp_minus_1)) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14)),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[17])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(19,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      (succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[18])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(20,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[18])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(21,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      ((~(~((~(succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13)) | (~(succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))))) <=> ((~(succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13)) | (~(succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14)))),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(22,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      (((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14)) <=> (~((~(succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13)) | (~(succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))))),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(23,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      ((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) <=> (~(~((~(succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13)) | (~(succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14)))))),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[22])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(24,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      ((~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))) <=> ((~(succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13)) | (~(succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14)))),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[23, 21])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      (~((succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13) & (succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[18])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(26,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      ((~(succ(tptp_minus_1) = D!13)) | (~(succ(succ(succ(tptp_minus_1))) = C!14))),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[25, 24])).
% 0.21/0.46  tff(27,plain,
% 0.21/0.46      ($false),
% 0.21/0.46      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[26, 20, 19])).
% 0.21/0.46  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------