TSTP Solution File: SWV232+1 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : SWV232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:16:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.84s 1.04s
% Output : Refutation 0.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWV232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 02:16:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.84/1.04 # Version: 1.3
% 0.84/1.04 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.84/1.04 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.84/1.04 fof(quaternion_ds1_symm_0841,conjecture,((![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,n5))&leq(B,n5))=>a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))=>(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))=>((((((((((((~(n0=C&n1=D))&(~(n0=C&n2=D)))&(~(n0=D&n2=C)))&(~(n1=C&n1=D)))&(~(n1=C&n2=D)))&(~(n1=D&n2=C)))&(~(n2=C&n2=D)))&n0=D)&n1=C)&n1=D)&n2=C)=>a_select2(rho,n1)=n0))))),input).
% 0.84/1.04 fof(c66,negated_conjecture,(~((![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,n5))&leq(B,n5))=>a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))=>(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))=>((((((((((((~(n0=C&n1=D))&(~(n0=C&n2=D)))&(~(n0=D&n2=C)))&(~(n1=C&n1=D)))&(~(n1=C&n2=D)))&(~(n1=D&n2=C)))&(~(n2=C&n2=D)))&n0=D)&n1=C)&n1=D)&n2=C)=>a_select2(rho,n1)=n0)))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[quaternion_ds1_symm_0841])).
% 0.84/1.04 fof(c67,negated_conjecture,((![A]:(![B]:((((~leq(n0,A)|~leq(n0,B))|~leq(A,n5))|~leq(B,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))&(?[C]:(?[D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))&((((((((((((n0!=C|n1!=D)&(n0!=C|n2!=D))&(n0!=D|n2!=C))&(n1!=C|n1!=D))&(n1!=C|n2!=D))&(n1!=D|n2!=C))&(n2!=C|n2!=D))&n0=D)&n1=C)&n1=D)&n2=C)&a_select2(rho,n1)!=n0))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c66])).
% 0.84/1.04 fof(c68,negated_conjecture,((![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))))&(?[X10]:(?[X11]:((((leq(n0,X10)&leq(n0,X11))&leq(X10,n2))&leq(X11,n2))&((((((((((((n0!=X10|n1!=X11)&(n0!=X10|n2!=X11))&(n0!=X11|n2!=X10))&(n1!=X10|n1!=X11))&(n1!=X10|n2!=X11))&(n1!=X11|n2!=X10))&(n2!=X10|n2!=X11))&n0=X11)&n1=X10)&n1=X11)&n2=X10)&a_select2(rho,n1)!=n0))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c67])).
% 0.84/1.04 fof(c70,negated_conjecture,(![X8]:(![X9]:(((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))&((((leq(n0,skolem0001)&leq(n0,skolem0002))&leq(skolem0001,n2))&leq(skolem0002,n2))&((((((((((((n0!=skolem0001|n1!=skolem0002)&(n0!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&(n0!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001))&(n1!=skolem0001|n1!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001))&(n2!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&n0=skolem0002)&n1=skolem0001)&n1=skolem0002)&n2=skolem0001)&a_select2(rho,n1)!=n0))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c69,negated_conjecture,((![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))))&((((leq(n0,skolem0001)&leq(n0,skolem0002))&leq(skolem0001,n2))&leq(skolem0002,n2))&((((((((((((n0!=skolem0001|n1!=skolem0002)&(n0!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&(n0!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001))&(n1!=skolem0001|n1!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001))&(n2!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&n0=skolem0002)&n1=skolem0001)&n1=skolem0002)&n2=skolem0001)&a_select2(rho,n1)!=n0))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c68])).])).
% 0.84/1.04 cnf(c83,negated_conjecture,n0=skolem0002,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c70])).
% 0.84/1.04 cnf(c86,negated_conjecture,n2=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c70])).
% 0.84/1.04 cnf(c78,negated_conjecture,n0!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c70])).
% 0.84/1.04 cnf(c1151,plain,n0!=skolem0002,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c78, c86])).
% 0.84/1.04 cnf(c1152,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c1151, c83])).
% 0.84/1.04 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 # Initial clauses : 329
% 0.84/1.04 # Processed clauses : 164
% 0.84/1.04 # Factors computed : 0
% 0.84/1.04 # Resolvents computed: 679
% 0.84/1.04 # Tautologies deleted: 1
% 0.84/1.04 # Forward subsumed : 64
% 0.84/1.04 # Backward subsumed : 2
% 0.84/1.04 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.84/1.04 # User time : 0.680 s
% 0.84/1.04 # System time : 0.018 s
% 0.84/1.04 # Total time : 0.698 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------