TSTP Solution File: SWV216+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV216+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.76s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV216+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 02:07:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.76/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.98 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.76/0.98 The process was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.76/0.98 Wed Jun 15 02:07:36 2022
% 0.76/0.98 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 5254.
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.76/0.98 set(auto).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.76/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 formula_list(usable).
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.76/0.98 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.76/0.98 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.76/0.98 clauses in usable.
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.76/0.98 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 ------------> process usable:
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 ------------> process sos:
% 0.76/0.98 Following clause subsumed by 943 during input processing: 0 [demod,928] {-} gt($c1,tptp_minus_1).
% 0.76/0.98 Following clause subsumed by 943 during input processing: 0 [demod,930,933] {-} gt($c1,tptp_minus_1).
% 0.76/0.98 Following clause subsumed by 949 during input processing: 0 [demod,928] {-} gt($c1,n0).
% 0.76/0.98 Following clause subsumed by 949 during input processing: 0 [demod,930,933] {-} gt($c1,n0).
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.62 sec ----> 955 [binary,954.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.76/0.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.76/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.98 2 [] {-} -gt(A,A).
% 0.76/0.98 928,927 [] {-} n1=$c1.
% 0.76/0.98 930,929 [] {-} n2=$c2.
% 0.76/0.98 931 [] {-} n2=$c1.
% 0.76/0.98 933,932 [copy,931,demod,930] {-} $c2=$c1.
% 0.76/0.98 934 [] {-} n4=$c2.
% 0.76/0.98 936,935 [copy,934,demod,933] {-} n4=$c1.
% 0.76/0.98 953 [] {-} gt(n4,n1).
% 0.76/0.98 954 [copy,953,demod,936,928] {-} gt($c1,$c1).
% 0.76/0.98 955 [binary,954.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.98
% 0.76/0.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/0.99 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 ============ end of search ============
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Process 5254 finished Wed Jun 15 02:07:36 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------