TSTP Solution File: SWV211+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.37s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 359 ( 299 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 111 ( 29 avg)
% Number of connectives : 568 ( 221 ~; 77 |; 264 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 42 ( 16 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 10 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 4 sgn; 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(quaternion_ds1_symm_0001,conjecture,
! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,n5)
& leq(X18,n5) )
=> ( ( ~ ( n0 = X14
& n1 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n1 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n2 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n1 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n2 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n3 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n4 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n4 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n4 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n5 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& n0 = X14
& n0 = X18
& n1 = X14 )
=> n0 = times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n0)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cIL1Y7TxWR/E---3.1_9810.p',quaternion_ds1_symm_0001) ).
fof(c_0_1,plain,
! [X18,X14] :
( epred1_2(X14,X18)
<=> ( ~ ( n0 = X14
& n1 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n1 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n2 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n1 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n2 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n3 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n4 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n4 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n4 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n5 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& n0 = X14
& n0 = X18
& n1 = X14 ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X18,X14] :
( epred1_2(X14,X18)
=> ( ~ ( n0 = X14
& n1 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n1 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n2 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n0 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n1 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n2 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n1 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n2 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n3 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n2 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n3 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n3 = X18
& n4 = X14 )
& ~ ( n3 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n4 = X14
& n4 = X18 )
& ~ ( n4 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& ~ ( n4 = X18
& n5 = X14 )
& ~ ( n5 = X14
& n5 = X18 )
& n0 = X14
& n0 = X18
& n1 = X14 ) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,n5)
& leq(X18,n5) )
=> ( epred1_2(X14,X18)
=> n0 = times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n0)) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_symm_0001]),c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X69,X70] :
( ( n0 != X70
| n1 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X70
| n2 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X70
| n3 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X70
| n4 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X70
| n5 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X69
| n1 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X69
| n2 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X69
| n3 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X69
| n4 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 != X69
| n5 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X70
| n1 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X70
| n2 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X70
| n3 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X70
| n4 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X70
| n5 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X69
| n2 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X69
| n3 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X69
| n4 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 != X69
| n5 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n2 != X70
| n2 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n2 != X70
| n3 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n2 != X70
| n4 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n2 != X70
| n5 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n2 != X69
| n3 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n2 != X69
| n4 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n2 != X69
| n5 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n3 != X70
| n3 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n3 != X70
| n4 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n3 != X70
| n5 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n3 != X69
| n4 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n3 != X69
| n5 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n4 != X70
| n4 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n4 != X70
| n5 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n4 != X69
| n5 != X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n5 != X70
| n5 != X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 = X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n0 = X69
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) )
& ( n1 = X70
| ~ epred1_2(X70,X69) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( leq(n0,esk1_0)
& leq(n0,esk2_0)
& leq(esk1_0,n5)
& leq(esk2_0,n5)
& epred1_2(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& n0 != times(divide(n1,n400),a_select2(sigma,n0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( n0 != X1
| n1 != X2
| ~ epred1_2(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( n1 = X1
| ~ epred1_2(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( n0 = X1
| ~ epred1_2(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
epred1_2(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
~ epred1_2(X1,X2),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.14 % Problem : SWV211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:27:01 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cIL1Y7TxWR/E---3.1_9810.p
% 0.37/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.37/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # new_bool_3 with pid 9942 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.37/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with pid 9946 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN
% 0.37/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.37/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.52
% 0.37/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.37/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 29
% 0.37/0.52 # Initial clauses : 108
% 0.37/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 108
% 0.37/0.52 # Processed clauses : 20
% 0.37/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 0.37/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.37/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.37/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.37/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.37/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.37/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.37/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 88
% 0.37/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 198
% 0.37/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.37/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.37/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.37/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.37/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.37/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.37/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4467
% 0.37/0.52
% 0.37/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.52 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.37/0.52 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.37/0.52 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.37/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2112 pages
% 0.37/0.52
% 0.37/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.52 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.37/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.37/0.52 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.37/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
% 0.37/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.37/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------