%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV210+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SWV210+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 14:47:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.51  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.51  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.51  SPASS derived 185 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 211 clauses.
% 0.20/0.51  SPASS allocated 85852 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.51  SPASS spent	0:00:00.15 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.51  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.51  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.51  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.51  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.51  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  2[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc3)*r.
% 0.20/0.51  3[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc3,n2)*l.
% 0.20/0.51  4[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc2,n998)*l.
% 0.20/0.51  5[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc2)*r.
% 0.20/0.51  93[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(z_defuse,skc3,skc2),use)** -> .
% 0.20/0.51  147[0:Inp] || leq(u,n998) leq(v,n2) leq(n0,u) leq(n0,v) -> equal(a_select3(z_defuse,v,u),use)**.
% 0.20/0.51  188[0:Res:147.4,93.0] || leq(n0,skc3) leq(skc3,n2)*l leq(skc2,n998) leq(n0,skc2) -> .
% 0.20/0.51  381[0:MRR:188.0,188.1,188.2,188.3,2.0,3.0,4.0,5.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  Formulae used in the proof : quaternion_ds1_inuse_0021
% 0.20/0.51  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------