TSTP Solution File: SWV210+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV210+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 214 ( 122 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 66 ( 14 avg)
% Number of connectives : 248 ( 49 ~; 46 |; 141 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 39 ( 12 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 17 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn; 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(quaternion_ds1_inuse_0021,conjecture,
( ( a_select2(rho_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(rho_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(rho_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5) = use
& ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,n2)
& leq(X18,n998) )
=> a_select3(u_defuse,X14,X18) = use )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,n2)
& leq(X20,n998) )
=> a_select3(z_defuse,X4,X20) = use ) )
=> ! [X21,X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X21,n2)
& leq(X22,n998) )
=> a_select3(z_defuse,X21,X22) = use ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WaxH5RmUEi/E---3.1_4409.p',quaternion_ds1_inuse_0021) ).
fof(c_0_1,plain,
( epred1_0
<=> ( a_select2(rho_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(rho_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(rho_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5) = use
& ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,n2)
& leq(X18,n998) )
=> a_select3(u_defuse,X14,X18) = use )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,n2)
& leq(X20,n998) )
=> a_select3(z_defuse,X4,X20) = use ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
( epred1_0
=> ( a_select2(rho_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(rho_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(rho_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0) = use
& a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4) = use
& a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5) = use
& ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,n2)
& leq(X18,n998) )
=> a_select3(u_defuse,X14,X18) = use )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,n2)
& leq(X20,n998) )
=> a_select3(z_defuse,X4,X20) = use ) ) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
=> ! [X21,X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X21,n2)
& leq(X22,n998) )
=> a_select3(z_defuse,X21,X22) = use ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_inuse_0021]),c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X69,X70,X71,X72] :
( ( a_select2(rho_defuse,n0) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(rho_defuse,n1) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(rho_defuse,n2) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X69)
| ~ leq(n0,X70)
| ~ leq(X69,n2)
| ~ leq(X70,n998)
| a_select3(u_defuse,X69,X70) = use
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X71)
| ~ leq(n0,X72)
| ~ leq(X71,n2)
| ~ leq(X72,n998)
| a_select3(z_defuse,X71,X72) = use
| ~ epred1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
& leq(n0,esk1_0)
& leq(n0,esk2_0)
& leq(esk1_0,n2)
& leq(esk2_0,n998)
& a_select3(z_defuse,esk1_0,esk2_0) != use ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( a_select3(z_defuse,X1,X2) = use
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(X1,n2)
| ~ leq(X2,n998)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(z_defuse,esk1_0,esk2_0) != use,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( a_select3(z_defuse,X1,X2) = use
| ~ leq(X2,n998)
| ~ leq(X1,n2)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk2_0,n998),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk1_0,n2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV210+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:06:44 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WaxH5RmUEi/E---3.1_4409.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # new_bool_1 with pid 4490 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 127s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with pid 4492 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 127s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 29
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 99
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 99
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 93
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 93
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 150
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 123
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 148
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 79
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 93
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 76
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 129
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 260
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5493
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2100 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------