TSTP Solution File: SWV209+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV209+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.05s 1.26s
% Output   : Refutation 1.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SWV209+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:20:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.05/1.26  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.05/1.26  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.05/1.26  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.05/1.26  SPASS derived 1272 clauses, backtracked 659 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 1676 clauses.
% 1.05/1.26  SPASS allocated 87409 KBytes.
% 1.05/1.26  SPASS spent	0:00:00.91 on the problem.
% 1.05/1.26  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.05/1.26  		0:00:00.09 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.05/1.26  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 1.05/1.26  		0:00:00.03 for the backtracking.
% 1.05/1.26  		0:00:00.61 for the reduction.
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 60 :
% 1.05/1.26  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.05/1.26  2[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc1)*r.
% 1.05/1.26  3[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc1,n5)*l.
% 1.05/1.26  32[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(u,u)*.
% 1.05/1.26  34[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> .
% 1.05/1.26  56[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0),use)**.
% 1.05/1.26  57[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1),use)**.
% 1.05/1.26  58[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2),use)**.
% 1.05/1.26  59[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3),use)**.
% 1.05/1.26  60[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4),use)**.
% 1.05/1.26  61[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5),use)**.
% 1.05/1.26  84[0:Inp] || equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1),use)** -> .
% 1.05/1.26  126[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* -> gt(v,u) equal(u,v).
% 1.05/1.26  136[0:Inp] || leq(u,n1)* leq(n0,u) -> equal(u,n1) equal(u,n0).
% 1.05/1.26  149[0:Inp] || leq(u,n5)* leq(n0,u) -> equal(u,n5) equal(u,n4) equal(u,n3) equal(u,n2) equal(u,n1) equal(u,n0).
% 1.05/1.26  192[0:Res:126.1,84.0] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1),use).
% 1.05/1.26  210[0:Res:3.0,126.0] ||  -> gt(n5,skc1)*r equal(skc1,n5).
% 1.05/1.26  269[0:Res:2.0,149.0] || leq(skc1,n5)*l -> equal(skc1,n0) equal(skc1,n1) equal(skc1,n2) equal(skc1,n3) equal(skc1,n4) equal(skc1,n5).
% 1.05/1.26  273[0:Res:2.0,136.0] || leq(skc1,n1)*l -> equal(skc1,n1) equal(skc1,n0).
% 1.05/1.26  306[0:Res:2.0,126.0] ||  -> gt(skc1,n0)*l equal(skc1,n0).
% 1.05/1.26  373[0:MRR:269.0,3.0] ||  -> equal(skc1,n5)** equal(skc1,n4) equal(skc1,n3) equal(skc1,n2) equal(skc1,n1) equal(skc1,n0).
% 1.05/1.26  431[1:Spt:273.1] ||  -> equal(skc1,n1)**.
% 1.05/1.26  434[1:Rew:431.0,192.1] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1),use).
% 1.05/1.26  576[1:Rew:57.0,434.1,57.0,434.0,431.0,434.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  577[1:MRR:576.0,576.1,32.0,34.0] ||  -> .
% 1.05/1.26  641[1:Spt:577.0,273.1,431.0] || equal(skc1,n1)** -> .
% 1.05/1.26  642[1:Spt:577.0,273.0,273.2] || leq(skc1,n1)*l -> equal(skc1,n0).
% 1.05/1.26  643[1:MRR:373.4,641.0] ||  -> equal(skc1,n5)** equal(skc1,n4) equal(skc1,n3) equal(skc1,n2) equal(skc1,n0).
% 1.05/1.26  647[2:Spt:306.1] ||  -> equal(skc1,n0)**.
% 1.05/1.26  656[2:Rew:647.0,192.1] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0),use).
% 1.05/1.26  786[2:Rew:56.0,656.1,56.0,656.0,647.0,656.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  787[2:MRR:786.0,786.1,32.0,34.0] ||  -> .
% 1.05/1.26  849[2:Spt:787.0,306.1,647.0] || equal(skc1,n0)** -> .
% 1.05/1.26  850[2:Spt:787.0,306.0] ||  -> gt(skc1,n0)*l.
% 1.05/1.26  853[2:MRR:643.4,849.0] ||  -> equal(skc1,n5)** equal(skc1,n4) equal(skc1,n3) equal(skc1,n2).
% 1.05/1.26  859[3:Spt:210.1] ||  -> equal(skc1,n5)**.
% 1.05/1.26  870[3:Rew:859.0,192.1] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5),use).
% 1.05/1.26  1004[3:Rew:61.0,870.1,61.0,870.0,859.0,870.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  1005[3:MRR:1004.0,1004.1,32.0,34.0] ||  -> .
% 1.05/1.26  1067[3:Spt:1005.0,210.1,859.0] || equal(skc1,n5)** -> .
% 1.05/1.26  1068[3:Spt:1005.0,210.0] ||  -> gt(n5,skc1)*r.
% 1.05/1.26  1069[3:MRR:853.0,1067.0] ||  -> equal(skc1,n4)** equal(skc1,n3) equal(skc1,n2).
% 1.05/1.26  1679[4:Spt:1069.0] ||  -> equal(skc1,n4)**.
% 1.05/1.26  1701[4:Rew:1679.0,192.1] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4),use).
% 1.05/1.26  1835[4:Rew:60.0,1701.1] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  1836[4:Rew:1679.0,1835.0] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4))*r -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  1837[4:Rew:60.0,1836.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  1838[4:MRR:1837.0,1837.1,32.0,34.0] ||  -> .
% 1.05/1.26  1898[4:Spt:1838.0,1069.0,1679.0] || equal(skc1,n4)** -> .
% 1.05/1.26  1899[4:Spt:1838.0,1069.1,1069.2] ||  -> equal(skc1,n3)** equal(skc1,n2).
% 1.05/1.26  1901[5:Spt:1899.0] ||  -> equal(skc1,n3)**.
% 1.05/1.26  1913[5:Rew:1901.0,192.1] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3),use).
% 1.05/1.26  2055[5:Rew:59.0,1913.1] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  2056[5:Rew:1901.0,2055.0] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3))*r -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  2057[5:Rew:59.0,2056.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  2058[5:MRR:2057.0,2057.1,32.0,34.0] ||  -> .
% 1.05/1.26  2118[5:Spt:2058.0,1899.0,1901.0] || equal(skc1,n3)** -> .
% 1.05/1.26  2119[5:Spt:2058.0,1899.1] ||  -> equal(skc1,n2)**.
% 1.05/1.26  2169[5:Rew:2119.0,192.1,2119.0,192.0] || leq(use,a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2))*r -> gt(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2),use).
% 1.05/1.26  2170[5:Rew:58.0,2169.1,58.0,2169.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 1.05/1.26  2171[5:MRR:2170.0,2170.1,32.0,34.0] ||  -> .
% 1.05/1.26  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.05/1.26  Formulae used in the proof : quaternion_ds1_inuse_0020 reflexivity_leq irreflexivity_gt leq_gt2 finite_domain_1 finite_domain_5
% 1.05/1.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------