TSTP Solution File: SWV204+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV204+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.68s 0.86s
% Output : Refutation 0.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV204+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 04:31:21 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.68/0.86
% 0.68/0.86 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.68/0.86 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.68/0.86 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.68/0.86 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.68/0.86 SPASS derived 438 clauses, backtracked 253 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 779 clauses.
% 0.68/0.86 SPASS allocated 86466 KBytes.
% 0.68/0.86 SPASS spent 0:00:00.49 on the problem.
% 0.68/0.86 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.68/0.86 0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.68/0.86 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.68/0.86 0:00:00.02 for the backtracking.
% 0.68/0.86 0:00:00.26 for the reduction.
% 0.68/0.86
% 0.68/0.86
% 0.68/0.86 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 27 :
% 0.68/0.86 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.68/0.86 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc1)*r.
% 0.68/0.86 3[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc1,n2)*l.
% 0.68/0.86 32[0:Inp] || -> leq(u,u)*.
% 0.68/0.86 34[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> .
% 0.68/0.86 38[0:Inp] || -> equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n0),use)**.
% 0.68/0.86 39[0:Inp] || -> equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n1),use)**.
% 0.68/0.86 40[0:Inp] || -> equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n2),use)**.
% 0.68/0.86 84[0:Inp] || equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,skc1),use)** -> .
% 0.68/0.86 126[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* -> gt(v,u) equal(u,v).
% 0.68/0.86 138[0:Inp] || leq(u,n2)* leq(n0,u) -> equal(u,n2) equal(u,n1) equal(u,n0).
% 0.68/0.86 192[0:Res:126.1,84.0] || leq(use,a_select2(rho_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(rho_defuse,skc1),use).
% 0.68/0.86 244[0:Res:3.0,138.1] || leq(n0,skc1)*r -> equal(skc1,n0) equal(skc1,n1) equal(skc1,n2).
% 0.68/0.86 376[0:MRR:244.0,2.0] || -> equal(skc1,n2)** equal(skc1,n1) equal(skc1,n0).
% 0.68/0.86 438[1:Spt:376.0] || -> equal(skc1,n2)**.
% 0.68/0.86 441[1:Rew:438.0,192.1] || leq(use,a_select2(rho_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(rho_defuse,n2),use).
% 0.68/0.86 583[1:Rew:40.0,441.1,40.0,441.0,438.0,441.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 0.68/0.86 584[1:MRR:583.0,583.1,32.0,34.0] || -> .
% 0.68/0.86 644[1:Spt:584.0,376.0,438.0] || equal(skc1,n2)** -> .
% 0.68/0.86 645[1:Spt:584.0,376.1,376.2] || -> equal(skc1,n1)** equal(skc1,n0).
% 0.68/0.86 649[2:Spt:645.0] || -> equal(skc1,n1)**.
% 0.68/0.86 658[2:Rew:649.0,192.1] || leq(use,a_select2(rho_defuse,skc1))*r -> gt(a_select2(rho_defuse,n1),use).
% 0.68/0.86 791[2:Rew:39.0,658.1,39.0,658.0,649.0,658.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 0.68/0.86 792[2:MRR:791.0,791.1,32.0,34.0] || -> .
% 0.68/0.86 852[2:Spt:792.0,645.0,649.0] || equal(skc1,n1)** -> .
% 0.68/0.86 853[2:Spt:792.0,645.1] || -> equal(skc1,n0)**.
% 0.68/0.86 886[2:Rew:38.0,192.1,853.0,192.1,38.0,192.0,853.0,192.0] || leq(use,use)* -> gt(use,use).
% 0.68/0.86 887[2:MRR:886.0,886.1,32.0,34.0] || -> .
% 0.68/0.86 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.68/0.86 Formulae used in the proof : quaternion_ds1_inuse_0015 reflexivity_leq irreflexivity_gt leq_gt2 finite_domain_2
% 0.68/0.86
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------