TSTP Solution File: SWV200+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV200+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV200+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 23:55:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.54 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.54 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.54 SPASS derived 186 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 219 clauses.
% 0.19/0.54 SPASS allocated 85875 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.54 SPASS spent 0:00:00.19 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.54 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.54 0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.54 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.54 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.54 0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.19/0.54 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.54 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc3)*r.
% 0.19/0.54 3[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc3,n2)*l.
% 0.19/0.54 7[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc2)*r.
% 0.19/0.54 37[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r.
% 0.19/0.54 96[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(u_defuse,skc3,skc2),use)** -> .
% 0.19/0.54 155[0:Inp] || leq(u,n2) leq(v,pred(pv5)) leq(n0,v) leq(n0,u) -> equal(a_select3(u_defuse,u,v),use)**.
% 0.19/0.54 194[0:Res:155.4,96.0] || leq(n0,skc3) leq(skc3,n2) leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r leq(n0,skc2) -> .
% 0.19/0.54 388[0:MRR:194.0,194.1,194.2,194.3,2.0,3.0,37.0,7.0] || -> .
% 0.19/0.54 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.54 Formulae used in the proof : quaternion_ds1_inuse_0011
% 0.19/0.54
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------