TSTP Solution File: SWV199+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV199+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.59s 1.80s
% Output   : Refutation 1.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SWV199+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 16:30:49 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.59/1.80  
% 1.59/1.80  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.59/1.80  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.59/1.80  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.59/1.80  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.59/1.80  SPASS derived 4751 clauses, backtracked 599 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 2967 clauses.
% 1.59/1.80  SPASS allocated 89629 KBytes.
% 1.59/1.80  SPASS spent	0:00:01.40 on the problem.
% 1.59/1.80  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.59/1.80  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.59/1.80  		0:00:00.03 for inferences.
% 1.59/1.80  		0:00:00.02 for the backtracking.
% 1.59/1.80  		0:00:01.11 for the reduction.
% 1.59/1.80  
% 1.59/1.80  
% 1.59/1.80  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 92 :
% 1.59/1.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.59/1.80  2[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc3)*r.
% 1.59/1.80  3[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc3,n2)*l.
% 1.59/1.80  4[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv5)*r.
% 1.59/1.80  5[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv5,n0)*l.
% 1.59/1.80  7[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc2,pv5)*l.
% 1.59/1.80  8[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc2)*r.
% 1.59/1.80  37[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(u,u)*.
% 1.59/1.80  38[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(n0),n1)**.
% 1.59/1.80  67[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(succ(n0)),n2)**.
% 1.59/1.80  84[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(pred(succ(u)),u)**.
% 1.59/1.80  92[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(plus(u,n1),succ(u))**.
% 1.59/1.80  96[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(z_defuse,skc3,skc2),use)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  103[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(succ(u)),plus(u,n2))**.
% 1.59/1.80  104[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(succ(u)),plus(n2,u))**.
% 1.59/1.80  107[0:Inp] || equal(skc2,pv5) equal(skc3,n0)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  108[0:Inp] || equal(skc2,pv5) equal(skc3,n1)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  109[0:Inp] || equal(skc2,pv5) equal(skc3,n2)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  112[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)*+ -> leq(v,pred(u))*.
% 1.59/1.80  134[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* -> gt(v,u) equal(u,v).
% 1.59/1.80  138[0:Inp] || leq(u,n0)*+ leq(n0,u)* -> equal(u,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  140[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* leq(v,w)* -> leq(u,w)*.
% 1.59/1.80  144[0:Inp] || leq(u,n1)* leq(n0,u) -> equal(u,n1) equal(u,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  154[0:Inp] || leq(u,n2) leq(v,pred(pv5)) leq(n0,v) leq(n0,u) -> equal(a_select3(z_defuse,u,v),use)**.
% 1.59/1.80  181[0:Rew:38.0,67.0] ||  -> equal(succ(n1),n2)**.
% 1.59/1.80  185[0:Rew:104.0,103.0] ||  -> equal(plus(n2,u),plus(u,n2))*.
% 1.59/1.80  194[0:Res:154.4,96.0] || leq(n0,skc3) leq(skc3,n2) leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r leq(n0,skc2) -> .
% 1.59/1.80  223[0:Res:8.0,144.0] || leq(skc2,n1)*l -> equal(skc2,n1) equal(skc2,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  224[0:Res:8.0,138.0] || leq(skc2,n0)*l -> equal(skc2,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  256[0:Res:8.0,134.0] ||  -> gt(skc2,n0)*l equal(skc2,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  336[0:Res:7.0,134.0] ||  -> gt(pv5,skc2)*r equal(skc2,pv5).
% 1.59/1.80  383[0:MRR:194.0,194.1,194.3,2.0,3.0,8.0] || leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r -> .
% 1.59/1.80  438[1:Spt:223.1] ||  -> equal(skc2,n1)**.
% 1.59/1.80  454[1:Rew:438.0,224.1] || leq(skc2,n0)*l -> equal(n1,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  538[1:Rew:438.0,7.0] ||  -> leq(n1,pv5)*r.
% 1.59/1.80  541[1:Rew:438.0,383.0] || leq(n1,pred(pv5))*r -> .
% 1.59/1.80  571[1:Rew:438.0,454.0] || leq(n1,n0)*l -> equal(n1,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  676[0:SpR:38.0,84.0] ||  -> equal(pred(n1),n0)**.
% 1.59/1.80  677[0:SpR:181.0,84.0] ||  -> equal(pred(n2),n1)**.
% 1.59/1.80  728[0:SpR:104.0,84.0] ||  -> equal(pred(plus(n2,u)),succ(u))**.
% 1.59/1.80  752[0:SpR:185.0,728.0] ||  -> equal(pred(plus(u,n2)),succ(u))**.
% 1.59/1.80  801[1:OCh:140.1,140.0,538.0,5.0] ||  -> leq(n1,n0)*l.
% 1.59/1.80  802[1:MRR:571.0,801.0] ||  -> equal(n1,n0)**.
% 1.59/1.80  806[1:Rew:802.0,38.0] ||  -> equal(succ(n0),n0)**.
% 1.59/1.80  807[1:Rew:802.0,181.0] ||  -> equal(succ(n0),n2)**.
% 1.59/1.80  817[1:Rew:802.0,92.0] ||  -> equal(plus(u,n0),succ(u))**.
% 1.59/1.80  866[1:Rew:802.0,541.0] || leq(n0,pred(pv5))*r -> .
% 1.59/1.80  949[1:Rew:806.0,807.0] ||  -> equal(n2,n0)**.
% 1.59/1.80  957[1:Rew:949.0,752.0] ||  -> equal(pred(plus(u,n0)),succ(u))**.
% 1.59/1.80  1031[1:Rew:817.0,957.0] ||  -> equal(pred(succ(u)),succ(u))**.
% 1.59/1.80  1032[1:Rew:84.0,1031.0] ||  -> equal(succ(u),u)**.
% 1.59/1.80  1033[1:Rew:1032.0,84.0] ||  -> equal(pred(u),u)**.
% 1.59/1.80  1100[1:Rew:1033.0,866.0] || leq(n0,pv5)*r -> .
% 1.59/1.80  1101[1:MRR:1100.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 1.59/1.80  1185[1:Spt:1101.0,223.1,438.0] || equal(skc2,n1)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  1186[1:Spt:1101.0,223.0,223.2] || leq(skc2,n1)*l -> equal(skc2,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  1191[2:Spt:256.1] ||  -> equal(skc2,n0)**.
% 1.59/1.80  1203[2:Rew:1191.0,336.1] ||  -> gt(pv5,skc2)*r equal(pv5,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  1204[2:Rew:1191.0,107.0] || equal(pv5,n0) equal(skc3,n0)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  1205[2:Rew:1191.0,108.0] || equal(pv5,n0) equal(skc3,n1)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  1206[2:Rew:1191.0,109.0] || equal(pv5,n0) equal(skc3,n2)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  1215[2:Rew:1191.0,383.0] || leq(n0,pred(pv5))*r -> .
% 1.59/1.80  1320[2:Rew:1191.0,1203.0] ||  -> gt(pv5,n0)*l equal(pv5,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  1542[3:Spt:1204.0] || equal(pv5,n0)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  1543[3:MRR:1320.1,1542.0] ||  -> gt(pv5,n0)*l.
% 1.59/1.80  4676[3:Res:1543.0,112.0] ||  -> leq(n0,pred(pv5))*r.
% 1.59/1.80  4830[3:MRR:4676.0,1215.0] ||  -> .
% 1.59/1.80  4935[3:Spt:4830.0,1204.0,1542.0] ||  -> equal(pv5,n0)**.
% 1.59/1.80  4936[3:Spt:4830.0,1204.1] || equal(skc3,n0)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  5017[3:Rew:4935.0,1205.0] || equal(n0,n0) equal(skc3,n1)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  5018[3:Obv:5017.0] || equal(skc3,n1)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  5019[3:Rew:4935.0,1206.0] || equal(n0,n0) equal(skc3,n2)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  5020[3:Obv:5019.0] || equal(skc3,n2)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  6055[0:Res:3.0,134.0] ||  -> gt(n2,skc3)*r equal(skc3,n2).
% 1.59/1.80  6256[3:MRR:6055.1,5020.0] ||  -> gt(n2,skc3)*r.
% 1.59/1.80  6268[3:Res:6256.0,112.0] ||  -> leq(skc3,pred(n2))*r.
% 1.59/1.80  6279[3:Rew:677.0,6268.0] ||  -> leq(skc3,n1)*l.
% 1.59/1.80  6280[3:Res:6279.0,134.0] ||  -> gt(n1,skc3)*r equal(skc3,n1).
% 1.59/1.80  6292[3:MRR:6280.1,5018.0] ||  -> gt(n1,skc3)*r.
% 1.59/1.80  6293[3:Res:6292.0,112.0] ||  -> leq(skc3,pred(n1))*r.
% 1.59/1.80  6304[3:Rew:676.0,6293.0] ||  -> leq(skc3,n0)*l.
% 1.59/1.80  6445[3:NCh:140.2,140.0,6304.0,138.0] || leq(n0,n0) leq(n0,skc3)*r -> equal(skc3,n0).
% 1.59/1.80  6453[3:MRR:6445.0,6445.1,6445.2,37.0,2.0,4936.0] ||  -> .
% 1.59/1.80  6454[2:Spt:6453.0,256.1,1191.0] || equal(skc2,n0)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  6455[2:Spt:6453.0,256.0] ||  -> gt(skc2,n0)*l.
% 1.59/1.80  6458[2:MRR:224.1,6454.0] || leq(skc2,n0)*l -> .
% 1.59/1.80  6481[3:Spt:336.1] ||  -> equal(skc2,pv5)**.
% 1.59/1.80  6508[3:Rew:6481.0,6458.0] || leq(pv5,n0)*l -> .
% 1.59/1.80  6633[3:MRR:6508.0,5.0] ||  -> .
% 1.59/1.80  6707[3:Spt:6633.0,336.1,6481.0] || equal(skc2,pv5)** -> .
% 1.59/1.80  6708[3:Spt:6633.0,336.0] ||  -> gt(pv5,skc2)*r.
% 1.59/1.80  6709[3:Res:6708.0,112.0] ||  -> leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r.
% 1.59/1.80  6719[3:MRR:6709.0,383.0] ||  -> .
% 1.59/1.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.59/1.80  Formulae used in the proof : quaternion_ds1_inuse_0010 reflexivity_leq successor_1 successor_2 pred_succ succ_plus_1_r succ_plus_2_r succ_plus_2_l leq_gt_pred leq_gt2 finite_domain_0 transitivity_leq finite_domain_1
% 1.59/1.80  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------