TSTP Solution File: SWV199+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV199+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.62s 2.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  19 unt;   3 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   64 (  34 equ;  33 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_207,plain,
    ( leq(pv5,n0)
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_207) ).

cnf(i_0_141,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_141) ).

cnf(i_0_208,plain,
    ( leq(n0,pv5)
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_208) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( X1 = n0
    | ~ leq(X1,n0)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_137,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk22_0,pv5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_137) ).

cnf(i_0_136,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk21_0 != n0
    | pv5 != esk22_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_136) ).

cnf(i_0_139,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk22_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_139) ).

cnf(i_0_134,negated_conjecture,
    ( n2 != esk21_0
    | pv5 != esk22_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_134) ).

cnf(i_0_135,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk21_0 != n1
    | pv5 != esk22_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_135) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( X1 = n0
    | X1 = n1
    | X1 = n2
    | ~ leq(X1,n2)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_138,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk21_0,n2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_138) ).

cnf(i_0_140,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk21_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-prirsfkp/lgb.p',i_0_140) ).

cnf(c_0_221,plain,
    ( leq(pv5,n0)
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    i_0_207 ).

cnf(c_0_222,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0,
    i_0_141 ).

cnf(c_0_223,plain,
    ( leq(n0,pv5)
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    i_0_208 ).

cnf(c_0_224,plain,
    ( X1 = n0
    | ~ leq(X1,n0)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_225,plain,
    leq(pv5,n0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_221,c_0_222])]) ).

cnf(c_0_226,plain,
    leq(n0,pv5),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_223,c_0_222])]) ).

cnf(c_0_227,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk22_0,pv5),
    i_0_137 ).

cnf(c_0_228,plain,
    pv5 = n0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_224,c_0_225]),c_0_226])]) ).

cnf(c_0_229,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk21_0 != n0
    | pv5 != esk22_0 ),
    i_0_136 ).

cnf(c_0_230,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk22_0,n0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_227,c_0_228]) ).

cnf(c_0_231,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk22_0),
    i_0_139 ).

cnf(c_0_232,negated_conjecture,
    ( n2 != esk21_0
    | pv5 != esk22_0 ),
    i_0_134 ).

cnf(c_0_233,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk21_0 != n1
    | pv5 != esk22_0 ),
    i_0_135 ).

cnf(c_0_234,plain,
    ( X1 = n0
    | X1 = n1
    | X1 = n2
    | ~ leq(X1,n2)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_235,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk21_0,n2),
    i_0_138 ).

cnf(c_0_236,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk21_0),
    i_0_140 ).

cnf(c_0_237,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk21_0 != n0
    | esk22_0 != n0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_229,c_0_228]) ).

cnf(c_0_238,plain,
    esk22_0 = n0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_224,c_0_230]),c_0_231])]) ).

cnf(c_0_239,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk21_0 != n2
    | esk22_0 != n0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_232,c_0_228]) ).

cnf(c_0_240,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk22_0 != n0
    | esk21_0 != n1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_233,c_0_228]) ).

cnf(c_0_241,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk21_0 = n0
    | esk21_0 = n2
    | esk21_0 = n1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_234,c_0_235]),c_0_236])]) ).

cnf(c_0_242,negated_conjecture,
    esk21_0 != n0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_237,c_0_238])]) ).

cnf(c_0_243,negated_conjecture,
    esk21_0 != n2,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_239,c_0_238])]) ).

cnf(c_0_244,negated_conjecture,
    esk21_0 != n1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_240,c_0_238])]) ).

cnf(c_0_245,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_241,c_0_242]),c_0_243]),c_0_244]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV199+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 15:38:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.62/2.60  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.62/2.60  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.62/2.60  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.62/2.60  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___300_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 7.62/2.60  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.62/2.60  #
% 7.62/2.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 7.62/2.60  
% 7.62/2.60  # Proof found!
% 7.62/2.60  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.62/2.60  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.62/2.60  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.62/2.60  
% 7.62/2.60  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.62/2.60  # User time                : 0.031 s
% 7.62/2.60  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.62/2.60  # Total time               : 0.038 s
% 7.62/2.60  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.62/2.60  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------