%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV197+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWV197+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:44:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.55  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.55  SPASS derived 183 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 217 clauses.
% 0.20/0.55  SPASS allocated 85872 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.55  SPASS spent	0:00:00.19 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.55  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.55  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.55  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.55  2[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc3)*r.
% 0.20/0.55  3[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc3,n2)*l.
% 0.20/0.55  7[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc2)*r.
% 0.20/0.55  37[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r.
% 0.20/0.55  96[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(z_defuse,skc3,skc2),use)** -> .
% 0.20/0.55  154[0:Inp] || leq(u,n2) leq(v,pred(pv5)) leq(n0,v) leq(n0,u) -> equal(a_select3(z_defuse,u,v),use)**.
% 0.20/0.55  194[0:Res:154.4,96.0] || leq(n0,skc3) leq(skc3,n2) leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r leq(n0,skc2) -> .
% 0.20/0.55  385[0:MRR:194.0,194.1,194.2,194.3,2.0,3.0,37.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.55  Formulae used in the proof : quaternion_ds1_inuse_0008
% 0.20/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------