TSTP Solution File: SWV194+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV194+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.09s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 1.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV194+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 16:55:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.09/1.25  
% 1.09/1.25  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.09/1.25  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.09/1.25  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.09/1.25  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.09/1.25  SPASS derived 3509 clauses, backtracked 509 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 2240 clauses.
% 1.09/1.25  SPASS allocated 88814 KBytes.
% 1.09/1.25  SPASS spent	0:00:00.88 on the problem.
% 1.09/1.25  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.09/1.25  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.09/1.25  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 1.09/1.25  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 1.09/1.25  		0:00:00.63 for the reduction.
% 1.09/1.25  
% 1.09/1.25  
% 1.09/1.25  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 60 :
% 1.09/1.25  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.09/1.25  2[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc3)*r.
% 1.09/1.25  3[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc3,n2)*l.
% 1.09/1.25  4[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv5)*r.
% 1.09/1.25  5[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv5,n0)*l.
% 1.09/1.25  7[0:Inp] ||  -> gt(pv5,n0)*l.
% 1.09/1.25  8[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc2,pv5)*l.
% 1.09/1.25  9[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc2)*r.
% 1.09/1.25  39[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(n0),n1)**.
% 1.09/1.25  40[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> .
% 1.09/1.25  68[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(succ(n0)),n2)**.
% 1.09/1.25  85[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(pred(succ(u)),u)**.
% 1.09/1.25  93[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(plus(u,n1),succ(u))**.
% 1.09/1.25  97[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(u_defuse,skc3,skc2),use)** -> .
% 1.09/1.25  104[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(succ(u)),plus(u,n2))**.
% 1.09/1.25  105[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(succ(u)),plus(n2,u))**.
% 1.09/1.25  110[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)*+ -> leq(v,pred(u))*.
% 1.09/1.25  132[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* -> gt(v,u) equal(u,v).
% 1.09/1.25  136[0:Inp] || leq(u,n0)* leq(n0,u)* -> equal(u,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  138[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* leq(v,w)* -> leq(u,w)*.
% 1.09/1.25  142[0:Inp] || leq(u,n1)* leq(n0,u) -> equal(u,n1) equal(u,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  153[0:Inp] || leq(u,n2) leq(v,pred(pv5)) leq(n0,v) leq(n0,u) -> equal(a_select3(u_defuse,u,v),use)**.
% 1.09/1.25  179[0:Rew:39.0,68.0] ||  -> equal(succ(n1),n2)**.
% 1.09/1.25  183[0:Rew:105.0,104.0] ||  -> equal(plus(n2,u),plus(u,n2))*.
% 1.09/1.25  192[0:Res:153.4,97.0] || leq(n0,skc3) leq(skc3,n2) leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r leq(n0,skc2) -> .
% 1.09/1.25  221[0:Res:9.0,142.0] || leq(skc2,n1)*l -> equal(skc2,n1) equal(skc2,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  222[0:Res:9.0,136.0] || leq(skc2,n0)*l -> equal(skc2,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  334[0:Res:8.0,132.0] ||  -> gt(pv5,skc2)*r equal(skc2,pv5).
% 1.09/1.25  381[0:MRR:192.0,192.1,192.3,2.0,3.0,9.0] || leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r -> .
% 1.09/1.25  436[1:Spt:221.1] ||  -> equal(skc2,n1)**.
% 1.09/1.25  448[1:Rew:436.0,222.1] || leq(skc2,n0)*l -> equal(n1,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  532[1:Rew:436.0,8.0] ||  -> leq(n1,pv5)*r.
% 1.09/1.25  535[1:Rew:436.0,381.0] || leq(n1,pred(pv5))*r -> .
% 1.09/1.25  566[1:Rew:436.0,448.0] || leq(n1,n0)*l -> equal(n1,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  723[0:SpR:105.0,85.0] ||  -> equal(pred(plus(n2,u)),succ(u))**.
% 1.09/1.25  747[0:SpR:183.0,723.0] ||  -> equal(pred(plus(u,n2)),succ(u))**.
% 1.09/1.25  794[1:OCh:138.1,138.0,532.0,5.0] ||  -> leq(n1,n0)*l.
% 1.09/1.25  795[1:MRR:566.0,794.0] ||  -> equal(n1,n0)**.
% 1.09/1.25  799[1:Rew:795.0,39.0] ||  -> equal(succ(n0),n0)**.
% 1.09/1.25  800[1:Rew:795.0,179.0] ||  -> equal(succ(n0),n2)**.
% 1.09/1.25  810[1:Rew:795.0,93.0] ||  -> equal(plus(u,n0),succ(u))**.
% 1.09/1.25  858[1:Rew:795.0,535.0] || leq(n0,pred(pv5))*r -> .
% 1.09/1.25  941[1:Rew:799.0,800.0] ||  -> equal(n2,n0)**.
% 1.09/1.25  949[1:Rew:941.0,747.0] ||  -> equal(pred(plus(u,n0)),succ(u))**.
% 1.09/1.25  1023[1:Rew:810.0,949.0] ||  -> equal(pred(succ(u)),succ(u))**.
% 1.09/1.25  1024[1:Rew:85.0,1023.0] ||  -> equal(succ(u),u)**.
% 1.09/1.25  1025[1:Rew:1024.0,85.0] ||  -> equal(pred(u),u)**.
% 1.09/1.25  1092[1:Rew:1025.0,858.0] || leq(n0,pv5)*r -> .
% 1.09/1.25  1093[1:MRR:1092.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 1.09/1.25  1177[1:Spt:1093.0,221.1,436.0] || equal(skc2,n1)** -> .
% 1.09/1.25  1178[1:Spt:1093.0,221.0,221.2] || leq(skc2,n1)*l -> equal(skc2,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  1183[2:Spt:334.1] ||  -> equal(skc2,pv5)**.
% 1.09/1.25  1210[2:Rew:1183.0,222.1] || leq(skc2,n0)*l -> equal(pv5,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  1313[2:Rew:1183.0,1210.0] || leq(pv5,n0)*l -> equal(pv5,n0).
% 1.09/1.25  1314[2:MRR:1313.0,5.0] ||  -> equal(pv5,n0)**.
% 1.09/1.25  1315[2:Rew:1314.0,7.0] ||  -> gt(n0,n0)*.
% 1.09/1.25  1333[2:MRR:1315.0,40.0] ||  -> .
% 1.09/1.25  1446[2:Spt:1333.0,334.1,1183.0] || equal(skc2,pv5)** -> .
% 1.09/1.25  1447[2:Spt:1333.0,334.0] ||  -> gt(pv5,skc2)*r.
% 1.09/1.25  5298[2:Res:1447.0,110.0] ||  -> leq(skc2,pred(pv5))*r.
% 1.09/1.25  5307[2:MRR:5298.0,381.0] ||  -> .
% 1.09/1.25  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.09/1.25  Formulae used in the proof : quaternion_ds1_inuse_0005 successor_1 irreflexivity_gt successor_2 pred_succ succ_plus_1_r succ_plus_2_r succ_plus_2_l leq_gt_pred leq_gt2 finite_domain_0 transitivity_leq finite_domain_1
% 1.09/1.25  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------