TSTP Solution File: SWV189+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SWV189+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 16:42:12 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  114 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  116 (  35   ~;  21   |;  43   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (  33   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f8820,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f8810,f606]) ).

fof(f606,plain,
    ~ leq(n0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(superposition,[],[f587,f280]) ).

fof(f280,plain,
    n0 = succ(tptp_minus_1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    n0 = succ(tptp_minus_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(f587,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ leq(succ(X0),X0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f335,f285]) ).

fof(f285,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ gt(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ~ gt(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',irreflexivity_gt) ).

fof(f335,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( gt(succ(X1),X0)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f201]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( leq(X0,X1)
        | ~ gt(succ(X1),X0) )
      & ( gt(succ(X1),X0)
        | ~ leq(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
    <=> gt(succ(X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_succ_gt_equiv) ).

fof(f8810,plain,
    leq(n0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(superposition,[],[f253,f8808]) ).

fof(f8808,plain,
    n0 = sK13,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f8748,f535]) ).

fof(f535,plain,
    leq(sK13,n0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f506,f253]) ).

fof(f506,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ leq(X0,tptp_minus_1)
      | leq(X0,n0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f311,f280]) ).

fof(f311,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,succ(X1))
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,succ(X1))
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
     => leq(X0,succ(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_succ) ).

fof(f8748,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sK13,n0)
    | n0 = sK13 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f308,f252]) ).

fof(f252,plain,
    leq(n0,sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f188]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    ( init != a_select3(q_init,sK13,sK14)
    & leq(sK14,n4)
    & leq(n0,sK14)
    & leq(sK13,tptp_minus_1)
    & leq(n0,sK13)
    & ! [X2] :
        ( init = a_select3(center_init,X2,n0)
        | ~ leq(X2,n4)
        | ~ leq(n0,X2) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13,sK14])],[f185,f187,f186]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( init != a_select3(q_init,X0,X1)
            & leq(X1,n4)
            & leq(n0,X1) )
        & leq(X0,tptp_minus_1)
        & leq(n0,X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( init != a_select3(q_init,sK13,X1)
          & leq(X1,n4)
          & leq(n0,X1) )
      & leq(sK13,tptp_minus_1)
      & leq(n0,sK13) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( init != a_select3(q_init,sK13,X1)
        & leq(X1,n4)
        & leq(n0,X1) )
   => ( init != a_select3(q_init,sK13,sK14)
      & leq(sK14,n4)
      & leq(n0,sK14) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( init != a_select3(q_init,X0,X1)
            & leq(X1,n4)
            & leq(n0,X1) )
        & leq(X0,tptp_minus_1)
        & leq(n0,X0) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( init = a_select3(center_init,X2,n0)
        | ~ leq(X2,n4)
        | ~ leq(n0,X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( init != a_select3(q_init,X1,X2)
            & leq(X2,n4)
            & leq(n0,X2) )
        & leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
        & leq(n0,X1) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( init = a_select3(center_init,X0,n0)
        | ~ leq(X0,n4)
        | ~ leq(n0,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f109]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( init != a_select3(q_init,X1,X2)
            & leq(X2,n4)
            & leq(n0,X2) )
        & leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
        & leq(n0,X1) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( init = a_select3(center_init,X0,n0)
        | ~ leq(X0,n4)
        | ~ leq(n0,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0] :
          ( ( leq(X0,n4)
            & leq(n0,X0) )
         => init = a_select3(center_init,X0,n0) )
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ( leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
            & leq(n0,X1) )
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ( leq(X2,n4)
                & leq(n0,X2) )
             => init = a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X13] :
          ( ( leq(X13,n4)
            & leq(n0,X13) )
         => a_select3(center_init,X13,n0) = init )
     => ! [X17] :
          ( ( leq(X17,tptp_minus_1)
            & leq(n0,X17) )
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ( leq(X3,n4)
                & leq(n0,X3) )
             => init = a_select3(q_init,X17,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ! [X13] :
        ( ( leq(X13,n4)
          & leq(n0,X13) )
       => a_select3(center_init,X13,n0) = init )
   => ! [X17] :
        ( ( leq(X17,tptp_minus_1)
          & leq(n0,X17) )
       => ! [X3] :
            ( ( leq(X3,n4)
              & leq(n0,X3) )
           => init = a_select3(q_init,X17,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_init_0121) ).

fof(f308,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ leq(n0,X0)
      | ~ leq(X0,n0)
      | n0 = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( n0 = X0
      | ~ leq(X0,n0)
      | ~ leq(n0,X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f121]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( n0 = X0
      | ~ leq(X0,n0)
      | ~ leq(n0,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( leq(X0,n0)
        & leq(n0,X0) )
     => n0 = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',finite_domain_0) ).

fof(f253,plain,
    leq(sK13,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f188]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV189+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 05:07:56 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  % (29393)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.37  % (29396)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.15/0.38  % (29399)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (29395)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (29397)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (29398)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (29396)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (29400)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (29394)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.48  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.49  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)Memory used [KB]: 2333
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)Time elapsed: 0.117 s
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)Instructions burned: 231 (million)
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (29396)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (29393)Success in time 0.134 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------