TSTP Solution File: SWV183+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV183+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.87s 2.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   5 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_181,plain,
    ( a_select2(mu_init,X1) = init
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ leq(X1,n4)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-so9_ephb/input.p',i_0_181) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-so9_ephb/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    a_select2(mu_init,esk1_0) != init,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-so9_ephb/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,n4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-so9_ephb/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-so9_ephb/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(c_0_187,plain,
    ( a_select2(mu_init,X1) = init
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ leq(X1,n4)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    i_0_181 ).

cnf(c_0_188,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_189,negated_conjecture,
    a_select2(mu_init,esk1_0) != init,
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_190,plain,
    ( a_select2(mu_init,X1) = init
    | ~ leq(X1,n4)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_188])]) ).

cnf(c_0_191,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,n4),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_192,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_193,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_189,c_0_190]),c_0_191]),c_0_192])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SWV183+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:13:31 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.49  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.23/0.50  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.23/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.23/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.87/2.76  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.87/2.76  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.87/2.76  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 7.87/2.76  
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof found!
% 7.87/2.76  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.87/2.76  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object total steps             : 12
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object clause steps            : 7
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object conjectures             : 9
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 4
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 7.87/2.76  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 5
% 7.87/2.76  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.87/2.76  # Parsed axioms                        : 207
% 7.87/2.76  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Initial clauses                      : 207
% 7.87/2.76  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 207
% 7.87/2.76  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 7.87/2.76  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # ...remaining for further processing  : 13
% 7.87/2.76  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 7.87/2.76  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1
% 7.87/2.76  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 7.87/2.76  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Current number of processed clauses  : 13
% 7.87/2.76  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 7.87/2.76  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.87/2.76  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 7.87/2.76  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 7.87/2.76  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 194
% 7.87/2.76  # ...number of literals in the above   : 834
% 7.87/2.76  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.87/2.76  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7079
% 7.87/2.76  
% 7.87/2.76  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.87/2.76  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 7.87/2.76  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.87/2.76  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 7.87/2.76  # ...preprocessing         : 0.027 s
% 7.87/2.76  # ...main loop             : 0.001 s
% 7.87/2.76  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.87/2.76  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------