TSTP Solution File: SWV181+1 by leanCoP---2.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : leanCoP---2.2
% Problem  : SWV181+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leancop_casc.sh %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 19:49:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.75s 3.47s
% Output   : Proof 2.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV181+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 08:00:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.75/3.47  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/3.48  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/3.49  
% 2.75/3.49  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 2.75/3.49  fof(cl5_nebula_init_0081, conjecture, leq(tptp_float_0_001, pv76) & leq(n1, loopcounter) & gt(n1, loopcounter) & ! [_210791] : (leq(n0, _210791) & leq(_210791, n135299) => ! [_210819] : (leq(n0, _210819) & leq(_210819, n4) => a_select3(q_init, _210791, _210819) = init)) & ! [_210863] : (leq(n0, _210863) & leq(_210863, n4) => a_select3(center_init, _210863, n0) = init) & (gt(loopcounter, n0) => ! [_210917] : (leq(n0, _210917) & leq(_210917, n4) => a_select2(mu_init, _210917) = init)) & (gt(loopcounter, n0) => ! [_210968] : (leq(n0, _210968) & leq(_210968, n4) => a_select2(rho_init, _210968) = init)) & (gt(loopcounter, n0) => ! [_211019] : (leq(n0, _211019) & leq(_211019, n4) => a_select2(sigma_init, _211019) = init)) => ! [_211060] : (leq(n0, _211060) & leq(_211060, n4) => a_select2(muold_init, _211060) = init), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cl5_nebula_init_0081)).
% 2.75/3.49  fof(transitivity_gt, axiom, ! [_211937, _211940, _211943] : (gt(_211937, _211940) & gt(_211940, _211943) => gt(_211937, _211943)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax', transitivity_gt)).
% 2.75/3.49  fof(irreflexivity_gt, axiom, ! [_212122] : ~ gt(_212122, _212122), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax', irreflexivity_gt)).
% 2.75/3.49  fof(leq_gt2, axiom, ! [_212243, _212246] : (leq(_212243, _212246) & (! _212243) = _212246 => gt(_212246, _212243)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax', leq_gt2)).
% 2.75/3.49  
% 2.75/3.49  cnf(1, plain, [-(leq(n1, loopcounter))], clausify(cl5_nebula_init_0081)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf(2, plain, [-(gt(n1, loopcounter))], clausify(cl5_nebula_init_0081)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf(3, plain, [_43778 = _43823, -(_43823 = _43778)], theory(equality)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf(4, plain, [-(gt(_45224, _45355)), gt(_45157, _45290), _45157 = _45224, _45290 = _45355], theory(equality)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf(5, plain, [-(gt(_60292, _60403)), gt(_60292, _60348), gt(_60348, _60403)], clausify(transitivity_gt)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf(6, plain, [gt(_60759, _60759)], clausify(irreflexivity_gt)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf(7, plain, [-(gt(_62575, _62522)), leq(_62522, _62575), -(_62522 = _62575)], clausify(leq_gt2)).
% 2.75/3.49  
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1',plain,[gt(n1, n1)],start(6,bind([[_60759], [n1]]))).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1',plain,[-(gt(n1, n1)), gt(n1, loopcounter), gt(loopcounter, n1)],extension(5,bind([[_60292, _60348, _60403], [n1, loopcounter, n1]]))).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1.1',plain,[-(gt(n1, loopcounter))],extension(2)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1.2',plain,[-(gt(loopcounter, n1)), gt(n1, loopcounter), n1 = loopcounter, loopcounter = n1],extension(4,bind([[_45157, _45224, _45290, _45355], [n1, loopcounter, loopcounter, n1]]))).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1.2.1',plain,[-(gt(n1, loopcounter))],extension(2)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1.2.2',plain,[-(n1 = loopcounter), -(gt(loopcounter, n1)), leq(n1, loopcounter)],extension(7,bind([[_62522, _62575], [n1, loopcounter]]))).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1.2.2.1',plain,[gt(loopcounter, n1)],reduction('1.1')).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1.2.2.2',plain,[-(leq(n1, loopcounter))],extension(1)).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1.2.3',plain,[-(loopcounter = n1), n1 = loopcounter],extension(3,bind([[_43778, _43823], [n1, loopcounter]]))).
% 2.75/3.49  cnf('1.1.2.3.1',plain,[-(n1 = loopcounter)],lemmata('1.1.2')).
% 2.75/3.49  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 2.75/3.49  
% 2.75/3.49  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------