TSTP Solution File: SWV179+1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SWV179+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:31:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.18s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 145 ( 45 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 173 ( 43 ~; 37 |; 66 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 27 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 12 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn; 41 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( ! [X28] :
( ( leq(X28,n4)
& leq(n0,X28) )
=> init = a_select2(sigma_init,X28) )
& ! [X27] :
( ( leq(X27,n4)
& leq(n0,X27) )
=> init = a_select2(rho_init,X27) )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(X21,n4)
& leq(n0,X21) )
=> init = a_select2(mu_init,X21) )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(X20,pred(pv68))
& leq(n0,X20) )
=> init = a_select2(rhoold_init,X20) )
& ! [X19] :
( ( leq(X19,n4)
& leq(n0,X19) )
=> init = a_select2(muold_init,X19) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( leq(X3,n4)
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> init = a_select3(center_init,X3,n0) )
& ! [X13] :
( ( leq(X13,n135299)
& leq(n0,X13) )
=> ! [X17] :
( ( leq(X17,n4)
& leq(n0,X17) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X13,X17) = init ) )
& leq(pv68,n4)
& leq(n0,pv68) )
=> init = a_select2(rho_init,pv68) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_init_0071) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X28] :
( ( leq(X28,n4)
& leq(n0,X28) )
=> init = a_select2(sigma_init,X28) )
& ! [X27] :
( ( leq(X27,n4)
& leq(n0,X27) )
=> init = a_select2(rho_init,X27) )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(X21,n4)
& leq(n0,X21) )
=> init = a_select2(mu_init,X21) )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(X20,pred(pv68))
& leq(n0,X20) )
=> init = a_select2(rhoold_init,X20) )
& ! [X19] :
( ( leq(X19,n4)
& leq(n0,X19) )
=> init = a_select2(muold_init,X19) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( leq(X3,n4)
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> init = a_select3(center_init,X3,n0) )
& ! [X13] :
( ( leq(X13,n135299)
& leq(n0,X13) )
=> ! [X17] :
( ( leq(X17,n4)
& leq(n0,X17) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X13,X17) = init ) )
& leq(pv68,n4)
& leq(n0,pv68) )
=> init = a_select2(rho_init,pv68) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
~ ( ( ! [X0] :
( ( leq(X0,n4)
& leq(n0,X0) )
=> init = a_select2(sigma_init,X0) )
& ! [X1] :
( ( leq(X1,n4)
& leq(n0,X1) )
=> init = a_select2(rho_init,X1) )
& ! [X2] :
( ( leq(X2,n4)
& leq(n0,X2) )
=> init = a_select2(mu_init,X2) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( leq(X3,pred(pv68))
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> init = a_select2(rhoold_init,X3) )
& ! [X4] :
( ( leq(X4,n4)
& leq(n0,X4) )
=> init = a_select2(muold_init,X4) )
& ! [X5] :
( ( leq(X5,n4)
& leq(n0,X5) )
=> init = a_select3(center_init,X5,n0) )
& ! [X6] :
( ( leq(X6,n135299)
& leq(n0,X6) )
=> ! [X7] :
( ( leq(X7,n4)
& leq(n0,X7) )
=> init = a_select3(q_init,X6,X7) ) )
& leq(pv68,n4)
& leq(n0,pv68) )
=> init = a_select2(rho_init,pv68) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f156,plain,
( init != a_select2(rho_init,pv68)
& ! [X0] :
( init = a_select2(sigma_init,X0)
| ~ leq(X0,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X0) )
& ! [X1] :
( init = a_select2(rho_init,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) )
& ! [X2] :
( init = a_select2(mu_init,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X2) )
& ! [X3] :
( init = a_select2(rhoold_init,X3)
| ~ leq(X3,pred(pv68))
| ~ leq(n0,X3) )
& ! [X4] :
( init = a_select2(muold_init,X4)
| ~ leq(X4,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X4) )
& ! [X5] :
( init = a_select3(center_init,X5,n0)
| ~ leq(X5,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X5) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( init = a_select3(q_init,X6,X7)
| ~ leq(X7,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X7) )
| ~ leq(X6,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X6) )
& leq(pv68,n4)
& leq(n0,pv68) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).
fof(f157,plain,
( init != a_select2(rho_init,pv68)
& ! [X0] :
( init = a_select2(sigma_init,X0)
| ~ leq(X0,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X0) )
& ! [X1] :
( init = a_select2(rho_init,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) )
& ! [X2] :
( init = a_select2(mu_init,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X2) )
& ! [X3] :
( init = a_select2(rhoold_init,X3)
| ~ leq(X3,pred(pv68))
| ~ leq(n0,X3) )
& ! [X4] :
( init = a_select2(muold_init,X4)
| ~ leq(X4,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X4) )
& ! [X5] :
( init = a_select3(center_init,X5,n0)
| ~ leq(X5,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X5) )
& ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( init = a_select3(q_init,X6,X7)
| ~ leq(X7,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X7) )
| ~ leq(X6,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X6) )
& leq(pv68,n4)
& leq(n0,pv68) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f156]) ).
fof(f334,plain,
leq(n0,pv68),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).
fof(f335,plain,
leq(pv68,n4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).
fof(f341,plain,
! [X1] :
( init = a_select2(rho_init,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).
fof(f343,plain,
init != a_select2(rho_init,pv68),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).
cnf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
a_select2(rho_init,pv68) != init,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f343]) ).
cnf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(X0,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| a_select2(rho_init,X0) = init ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f341]) ).
cnf(c_165,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv68,n4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f335]) ).
cnf(c_166,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv68),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f334]) ).
cnf(c_8929,plain,
( ~ leq(pv68,n4)
| a_select2(rho_init,pv68) = init ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_166,c_159]) ).
cnf(c_8930,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8929,c_157,c_165]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWV179+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 08:51:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.18/1.17 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.18/1.17 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------ iProver source info
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.18/1.17 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.18/1.17 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.18/1.17 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Parsing...
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 16 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 clauses 157
% 3.18/1.17 conjectures 10
% 3.18/1.17 EPR 45
% 3.18/1.17 Horn 107
% 3.18/1.17 unary 56
% 3.18/1.17 binary 34
% 3.18/1.17 lits 512
% 3.18/1.17 lits eq 121
% 3.18/1.17 fd_pure 0
% 3.18/1.17 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.18/1.17 fd_cond 6
% 3.18/1.17 fd_pseudo_cond 4
% 3.18/1.17 AC symbols 0
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------
% 3.18/1.17 Current options:
% 3.18/1.17 ------
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.18/1.17
% 3.18/1.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------