TSTP Solution File: SWV179+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 132 ( 34 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 34 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 152 ( 35 ~; 32 |; 57 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 27 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 12 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn 32 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_init_0071,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv68)
& leq(pv68,n4)
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,n135299) )
=> ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X14,X18) = init ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X4,n0) = init )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X20,n4) )
=> a_select2(muold_init,X20) = init )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,pred(pv68)) )
=> a_select2(rhoold_init,X21) = init )
& ! [X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X22,n4) )
=> a_select2(mu_init,X22) = init )
& ! [X28] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(X28,n4) )
=> a_select2(rho_init,X28) = init )
& ! [X29] :
( ( leq(n0,X29)
& leq(X29,n4) )
=> a_select2(sigma_init,X29) = init ) )
=> a_select2(rho_init,pv68) = init ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cl5_nebula_init_0071) ).
fof(c_0_1,plain,
( epred1_0
<=> ( leq(n0,pv68)
& leq(pv68,n4)
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,n135299) )
=> ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X14,X18) = init ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X4,n0) = init )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X20,n4) )
=> a_select2(muold_init,X20) = init )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,pred(pv68)) )
=> a_select2(rhoold_init,X21) = init )
& ! [X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X22,n4) )
=> a_select2(mu_init,X22) = init )
& ! [X28] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(X28,n4) )
=> a_select2(rho_init,X28) = init )
& ! [X29] :
( ( leq(n0,X29)
& leq(X29,n4) )
=> a_select2(sigma_init,X29) = init ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
( epred1_0
=> ( leq(n0,pv68)
& leq(pv68,n4)
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,n135299) )
=> ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,n4) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X14,X18) = init ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,n4) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X4,n0) = init )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X20,n4) )
=> a_select2(muold_init,X20) = init )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,pred(pv68)) )
=> a_select2(rhoold_init,X21) = init )
& ! [X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X22,n4) )
=> a_select2(mu_init,X22) = init )
& ! [X28] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(X28,n4) )
=> a_select2(rho_init,X28) = init )
& ! [X29] :
( ( leq(n0,X29)
& leq(X29,n4) )
=> a_select2(sigma_init,X29) = init ) ) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
=> a_select2(rho_init,pv68) = init ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_init_0071]),c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X37] :
( ( leq(n0,pv68)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(pv68,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X30)
| ~ leq(X30,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X31)
| ~ leq(X31,n4)
| a_select3(q_init,X30,X31) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X32)
| ~ leq(X32,n4)
| a_select3(center_init,X32,n0) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X33)
| ~ leq(X33,n4)
| a_select2(muold_init,X33) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X34)
| ~ leq(X34,pred(pv68))
| a_select2(rhoold_init,X34) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X35)
| ~ leq(X35,n4)
| a_select2(mu_init,X35) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X36)
| ~ leq(X36,n4)
| a_select2(rho_init,X36) = init
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X37)
| ~ leq(X37,n4)
| a_select2(sigma_init,X37) = init
| ~ epred1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
& a_select2(rho_init,pv68) != init ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( a_select2(rho_init,X1) = init
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( leq(pv68,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( leq(n0,pv68)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
a_select2(rho_init,pv68) != init,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( a_select2(rho_init,X1) = init
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
leq(pv68,n4),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
leq(n0,pv68),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 20:56:45 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 15
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 26
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 79
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 78
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 43
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 43
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 33
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 31
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 33
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 43
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 66
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 155
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4315
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3220 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------