%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV172+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.43s 2.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   5 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_177,plain,
    ( a_select2(rho_init,X1) = init
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ leq(X1,n4)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h2vuyxtc/lgb.p',i_0_177) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h2vuyxtc/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_179,plain,
    ( leq(pv54,n4)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h2vuyxtc/lgb.p',i_0_179) ).

cnf(i_0_181,plain,
    ( leq(n0,pv54)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h2vuyxtc/lgb.p',i_0_181) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    a_select2(rho_init,pv54) != init,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h2vuyxtc/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_187,plain,
    ( a_select2(rho_init,X1) = init
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ leq(X1,n4)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    i_0_177 ).

cnf(c_0_188,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_189,plain,
    ( leq(pv54,n4)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    i_0_179 ).

cnf(c_0_190,plain,
    ( leq(n0,pv54)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    i_0_181 ).

cnf(c_0_191,negated_conjecture,
    a_select2(rho_init,pv54) != init,
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_192,plain,
    ( a_select2(rho_init,X1) = init
    | ~ leq(X1,n4)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_188])]) ).

cnf(c_0_193,plain,
    leq(pv54,n4),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_189,c_0_188])]) ).

cnf(c_0_194,plain,
    leq(n0,pv54),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_190,c_0_188])]) ).

cnf(c_0_195,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_191,c_0_192]),c_0_193]),c_0_194])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14  % Problem  : SWV172+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.09/0.15  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 19:13:12 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.50  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.51  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.51  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.22/0.51  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.22/0.51  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.43/2.55  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.43/2.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.43/2.55  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.43/2.55  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.43/2.55  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.43/2.55  #
% 8.43/2.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 8.43/2.55  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.43/2.55  
% 8.43/2.55  # Proof found!
% 8.43/2.55  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.43/2.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.43/2.55  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.43/2.55  
% 8.43/2.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.43/2.55  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 8.43/2.55  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 8.43/2.55  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 8.43/2.55  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.43/2.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------