TSTP Solution File: SWV168+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV168+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.38s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SWV168+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 16:42:26 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.38/0.55  
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.38/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS derived 254 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 212 clauses.
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS allocated 85953 KBytes.
% 0.38/0.55  SPASS spent	0:00:00.19 on the problem.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.38/0.55  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.38/0.55  
% 0.38/0.55  
% 0.38/0.55  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.38/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.38/0.55  2[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv40)*l.
% 0.38/0.55  3[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv46)*r.
% 0.38/0.55  4[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv40,n4)*r.
% 0.38/0.55  5[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv46,n135299)*r.
% 0.38/0.55  67[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(q_init,pv46,pv40),init)** -> .
% 0.38/0.55  128[0:Inp] || leq(u,n4) leq(v,n135299) leq(n0,u) leq(n0,v) -> equal(a_select3(q_init,v,u),init)**.
% 0.38/0.55  168[0:Res:128.4,67.0] || leq(n0,pv46) leq(pv46,n135299)*r leq(n0,pv40) leq(pv40,n4) -> .
% 0.38/0.55  441[0:MRR:168.0,168.1,168.2,168.3,3.0,5.0,2.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.38/0.55  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.38/0.55  Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_init_0016
% 0.38/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------