TSTP Solution File: SWV168+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWV168+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.37s 2.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 42 ( 5 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_178,plain,
( a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) = init
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(X1,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6co611m0/input.p',i_0_178) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6co611m0/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_180,plain,
( leq(pv40,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6co611m0/input.p',i_0_180) ).
cnf(i_0_179,plain,
( leq(pv46,n135299)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6co611m0/input.p',i_0_179) ).
cnf(i_0_182,plain,
( leq(n0,pv40)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6co611m0/input.p',i_0_182) ).
cnf(i_0_181,plain,
( leq(n0,pv46)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6co611m0/input.p',i_0_181) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(q_init,pv46,pv40) != init,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6co611m0/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_190,plain,
( a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) = init
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(X1,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
i_0_178 ).
cnf(c_0_191,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_192,plain,
( leq(pv40,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_180 ).
cnf(c_0_193,plain,
( leq(pv46,n135299)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_179 ).
cnf(c_0_194,plain,
( leq(n0,pv40)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_182 ).
cnf(c_0_195,plain,
( leq(n0,pv46)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_181 ).
cnf(c_0_196,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(q_init,pv46,pv40) != init,
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_197,plain,
( a_select3(q_init,X1,X2) = init
| ~ leq(X2,n4)
| ~ leq(X1,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_190,c_0_191])]) ).
cnf(c_0_198,plain,
leq(pv40,n4),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_192,c_0_191])]) ).
cnf(c_0_199,plain,
leq(pv46,n135299),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_193,c_0_191])]) ).
cnf(c_0_200,plain,
leq(n0,pv40),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_194,c_0_191])]) ).
cnf(c_0_201,plain,
leq(n0,pv46),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_195,c_0_191])]) ).
cnf(c_0_202,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_196,c_0_197]),c_0_198]),c_0_199]),c_0_200]),c_0_201])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV168+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 16:41:28 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.37/2.40 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.37/2.40 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.37/2.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 7.37/2.40
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof found!
% 7.37/2.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.37/2.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object total steps : 20
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object clause steps : 13
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 7.37/2.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 15
% 7.37/2.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.37/2.40 # Parsed axioms : 206
% 7.37/2.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Initial clauses : 206
% 7.37/2.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 206
% 7.37/2.40 # Processed clauses : 49
% 7.37/2.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 49
% 7.37/2.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Generated clauses : 73
% 7.37/2.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 68
% 7.37/2.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Paramodulations : 71
% 7.37/2.40 # Factorizations : 2
% 7.37/2.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 49
% 7.37/2.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 7.37/2.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 7.37/2.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 7.37/2.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 224
% 7.37/2.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 879
% 7.37/2.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 36
% 7.37/2.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 7.37/2.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 7.37/2.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 7.37/2.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.37/2.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7667
% 7.37/2.40
% 7.37/2.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.37/2.40 # User time : 0.011 s
% 7.37/2.40 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.37/2.40 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 7.37/2.40 # ...preprocessing : 0.014 s
% 7.37/2.40 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 7.37/2.40 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 7.37/2.40
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------