TSTP Solution File: SWV166+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV166+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV166+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 20:38:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.52 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.52 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.52 SPASS derived 155 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 174 clauses.
% 0.19/0.52 SPASS allocated 85810 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.52 SPASS spent 0:00:00.17 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.52 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.52 0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.52 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.52 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.52 0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.52 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc1)*r.
% 0.19/0.52 5[0:Inp] || -> gt(loopcounter,n1)*r.
% 0.19/0.52 6[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc1,n4)*l.
% 0.19/0.52 61[0:Inp] || equal(a_select2(rhoold_init,skc1),init)** -> .
% 0.19/0.52 120[0:Inp] || gt(loopcounter,n1) leq(n0,u) leq(u,n4) -> equal(a_select2(rhoold_init,u),init)**.
% 0.19/0.52 170[0:MRR:120.0,5.0] || leq(u,n4) leq(n0,u) -> equal(a_select2(rhoold_init,u),init)**.
% 0.19/0.52 198[0:Res:6.0,170.1] || leq(n0,skc1) -> equal(a_select2(rhoold_init,skc1),init)**.
% 0.19/0.52 335[0:MRR:198.0,198.1,2.0,61.0] || -> .
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.52 Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_init_0006
% 0.19/0.52
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------