TSTP Solution File: SWV164+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV164+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.76s 0.96s
% Output : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV164+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:12:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.76/0.96
% 0.76/0.96 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.76/0.96 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.76/0.96 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.76/0.96 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.76/0.96 SPASS derived 2670 clauses, backtracked 46 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 1404 clauses.
% 0.76/0.96 SPASS allocated 88142 KBytes.
% 0.76/0.96 SPASS spent 0:00:00.59 on the problem.
% 0.76/0.96 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.76/0.96 0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.76/0.96 0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.76/0.96 0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.76/0.96 0:00:00.33 for the reduction.
% 0.76/0.96
% 0.76/0.96
% 0.76/0.96 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 10 :
% 0.76/0.96 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.96 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc1)*r.
% 0.76/0.96 5[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc1,tptp_minus_1)*l.
% 0.76/0.96 44[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> .
% 0.76/0.96 46[0:Inp] || -> equal(succ(tptp_minus_1),n0)**.
% 0.76/0.96 88[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)*+ -> gt(succ(v),u)*.
% 0.76/0.96 114[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* leq(v,w)* -> leq(u,w)*.
% 0.76/0.96 3119[0:OCh:114.1,114.0,5.0,2.0] || -> leq(n0,tptp_minus_1)*r.
% 0.76/0.96 3863[0:Res:3119.0,88.0] || -> gt(succ(tptp_minus_1),n0)*l.
% 0.76/0.96 3873[0:Rew:46.0,3863.0] || -> gt(n0,n0)*.
% 0.76/0.96 3874[0:MRR:3873.0,44.0] || -> .
% 0.76/0.96 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/0.96 Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_norm_0014 irreflexivity_gt succ_tptp_minus_1 leq_succ_gt_equiv transitivity_leq
% 0.76/0.96
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------