TSTP Solution File: SWV163+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV163+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  19   ~;  13   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;  11 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn;  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pred_succ,axiom,
    ! [X1] : pred(succ(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q4hulVM93G/E---3.1_952.p',pred_succ) ).

fof(leq_succ,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
     => leq(X1,succ(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q4hulVM93G/E---3.1_952.p',leq_succ) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0013,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(n0,pv10)
      & leq(pv10,n135299)
      & ! [X14] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X14)
            & leq(X14,pred(pv10)) )
         => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X14,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) )
   => ! [X18] :
        ( ( leq(n0,X18)
          & leq(X18,tptp_minus_1) )
       => a_select3(q,pv10,X18) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X18,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X18,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q4hulVM93G/E---3.1_952.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0013) ).

fof(leq_gt_pred,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,pred(X2))
    <=> gt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q4hulVM93G/E---3.1_952.p',leq_gt_pred) ).

fof(succ_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q4hulVM93G/E---3.1_952.p',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(finite_domain_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X1)
        & leq(X1,n0) )
     => X1 = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q4hulVM93G/E---3.1_952.p',finite_domain_0) ).

fof(irreflexivity_gt,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ gt(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q4hulVM93G/E---3.1_952.p',irreflexivity_gt) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X60] : pred(succ(X60)) = X60,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[pred_succ]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X47,X48] :
      ( ~ leq(X47,X48)
      | leq(X47,succ(X48)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_succ])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(n0,pv10)
        & leq(pv10,n135299)
        & ! [X14] :
            ( ( leq(n0,X14)
              & leq(X14,pred(pv10)) )
           => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X14,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) )
     => ! [X18] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X18)
            & leq(X18,tptp_minus_1) )
         => a_select3(q,pv10,X18) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X18,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X18,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0013]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X58,X59] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X58,pred(X59))
        | gt(X59,X58) )
      & ( ~ gt(X59,X58)
        | leq(X58,pred(X59)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_gt_pred])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    pred(succ(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[succ_tptp_minus_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( leq(X1,succ(X2))
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X28] :
      ( leq(n0,pv10)
      & leq(pv10,n135299)
      & ( ~ leq(n0,X28)
        | ~ leq(X28,pred(pv10))
        | sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X28,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
      & leq(n0,esk1_0)
      & leq(esk1_0,tptp_minus_1)
      & a_select3(q,pv10,esk1_0) != divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,esk1_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,esk1_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( gt(X2,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,pred(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X34] :
      ( ~ leq(n0,X34)
      | ~ leq(X34,n0)
      | X34 = n0 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[finite_domain_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( leq(X1,n0)
    | ~ leq(X1,tptp_minus_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ gt(X1,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexivity_gt]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( gt(n0,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,tptp_minus_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( X1 = n0
    | ~ leq(n0,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,n0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,n0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X76] : ~ gt(X76,X76),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    gt(n0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = n0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ gt(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : SWV163+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:31:29 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q4hulVM93G/E---3.1_952.p
% 0.15/0.43  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # new_bool_3 with pid 1048 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 100s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1052 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 100s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 92
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 23
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 77
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 77
% 0.15/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 169
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 169
% 0.15/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.15/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 217
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 173
% 0.15/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 217
% 0.15/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 103
% 0.15/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 83
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 61
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 21
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 152
% 0.15/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 333
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 86
% 0.15/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 162
% 0.15/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 106
% 0.15/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32
% 0.15/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 10
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5689
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 2072 pages
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.15/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------