TSTP Solution File: SWV161+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWV161+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   52 (  15   ~;  11   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   2 sgn  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0011,conjecture,
    ( ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,pv10,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
      & leq(n0,pv10)
      & leq(pv10,n135299)
      & ! [X14] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X14)
            & leq(X14,pred(pv10)) )
         => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X14,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) )
   => ! [X18] :
        ( ( leq(n0,X18)
          & leq(X18,pv10) )
       => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X18,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cl5_nebula_norm_0011) ).

fof(leq_gt_pred,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,pred(X2))
    <=> gt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt_pred) ).

fof(leq_gt2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X2)
        & X1 != X2 )
     => gt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt2) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,pv10,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
        & leq(n0,pv10)
        & leq(pv10,n135299)
        & ! [X14] :
            ( ( leq(n0,X14)
              & leq(X14,pred(pv10)) )
           => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X14,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) )
     => ! [X18] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X18)
            & leq(X18,pv10) )
         => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X18,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0011]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X19] :
      ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,pv10,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
      & leq(n0,pv10)
      & leq(pv10,n135299)
      & ( ~ leq(n0,X19)
        | ~ leq(X19,pred(pv10))
        | sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X19,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
      & leq(n0,esk1_0)
      & leq(esk1_0,pv10)
      & sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk1_0,tptp_sum_index)) != n1 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk1_0,tptp_sum_index)) != n1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X1,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
    | ~ leq(X1,pred(pv10))
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X3,pred(X4))
        | gt(X4,X3) )
      & ( ~ gt(X4,X3)
        | leq(X3,pred(X4)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_gt_pred])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ leq(X3,X4)
      | X3 = X4
      | gt(X4,X3) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_gt2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(esk1_0,pred(pv10)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( leq(X1,pred(X2))
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( gt(X1,X2)
    | X2 = X1
    | ~ leq(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,pv10),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ gt(pv10,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,pv10,tptp_sum_index)) = n1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    pv10 = esk1_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV161+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 05:05:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 18
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 12
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 92
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 25
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 76
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 75
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 97
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 95
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 13
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 257
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 213
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 255
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 82
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 53
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 23
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 168
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 370
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 14
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 37
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 12
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6004
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 3452 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------