TSTP Solution File: SWV160+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWV160+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.62s 2.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 2 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk1_0,minus(pv10,n1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pirh5g5p/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = pv10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pirh5g5p/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_57,plain,
~ gt(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pirh5g5p/lgb.p',i_0_57) ).
cnf(i_0_61,plain,
( gt(X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,minus(X1,n1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pirh5g5p/lgb.p',i_0_61) ).
cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk1_0,minus(pv10,n1)),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = pv10,
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
~ gt(X1,X1),
i_0_57 ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( gt(X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,minus(X1,n1)) ),
i_0_61 ).
cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv10,minus(pv10,n1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
~ leq(X1,minus(X1,n1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWV160+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 09:34:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.62/2.28 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.62/2.28 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.62/2.28 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.62/2.28 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.62/2.28 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.62/2.28 #
% 7.62/2.28 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.62/2.28 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.62/2.28
% 7.62/2.28 # Proof found!
% 7.62/2.28 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.62/2.28 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.62/2.28 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.62/2.28
% 7.62/2.28 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.62/2.28 # User time : 0.025 s
% 7.62/2.28 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.62/2.28 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 7.62/2.28 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.62/2.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------