%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV159+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.32s 2.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   4 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk1_0,tptp_sum_index)) != n1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1xp0x_of/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X1,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
    | ~ leq(n0,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,minus(pv10,n1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1xp0x_of/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,minus(pv10,n1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1xp0x_of/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1xp0x_of/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk1_0,tptp_sum_index)) != n1,
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X1,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
    | ~ leq(n0,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,minus(pv10,n1)) ),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,minus(pv10,n1)),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV159+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 03:29:42 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.32/2.63  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.32/2.63  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.32/2.63  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.32/2.63  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.32/2.63  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.32/2.63  #
% 8.32/2.63  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 8.32/2.63  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.32/2.63  
% 8.32/2.63  # Proof found!
% 8.32/2.63  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.32/2.63  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.32/2.63  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.32/2.63  
% 8.32/2.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.32/2.63  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 8.32/2.63  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 8.32/2.63  # Total time               : 0.031 s
% 8.32/2.63  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.32/2.63  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------