TSTP Solution File: SWV159+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV159+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 59 ( 21 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 60 ( 14 ~; 8 |; 28 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 26 ( 26 usr; 17 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0009,conjecture,
( ( pv84 = sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv47)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(pv47,n4)
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,pred(pv47)) )
=> a_select3(q,pv10,X14) = divide(divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,X14)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,X14))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,X14),a_select2(sigma,X14)))),a_select2(rho,X14)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,X14))),sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))) )
& ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,pred(pv10)) )
=> sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X18,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) )
=> ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,pred(pv10)) )
=> ( pv10 != X4
=> sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X4,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cl5_nebula_norm_0009) ).
fof(pred_minus_1,axiom,
! [X1] : minus(X1,n1) = pred(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_minus_1) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( pv84 = sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv47)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(pv47,n4)
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(X14,pred(pv47)) )
=> a_select3(q,pv10,X14) = divide(divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,X14)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,X14))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,X14),a_select2(sigma,X14)))),a_select2(rho,X14)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,X14))),sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))) )
& ! [X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X18,pred(pv10)) )
=> sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X18,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) )
=> ! [X4] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(X4,pred(pv10)) )
=> ( pv10 != X4
=> sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X4,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0009]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X19,X20] :
( pv84 = sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv47)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(pv47,n4)
& ( ~ leq(n0,X19)
| ~ leq(X19,pred(pv47))
| a_select3(q,pv10,X19) = divide(divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,X19)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,X19))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,X19),a_select2(sigma,X19)))),a_select2(rho,X19)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,X19))),sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))) )
& ( ~ leq(n0,X20)
| ~ leq(X20,pred(pv10))
| sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X20,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
& leq(n0,esk1_0)
& leq(esk1_0,pred(pv10))
& pv10 != esk1_0
& sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk1_0,tptp_sum_index)) != n1 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X2] : minus(X2,n1) = pred(X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[pred_minus_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X1,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
| ~ leq(X1,pred(pv10))
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
minus(X1,n1) = pred(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk1_0,pred(pv10)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk1_0,tptp_sum_index)) != n1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X1,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,minus(pv10,n1)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
leq(esk1_0,minus(pv10,n1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : SWV159+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 04:19:53 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 100
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 90
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 88
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 122
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4552
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 2976 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------