%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV142+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SWV142+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 14:20:13 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/0.54  
% 0.37/0.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.37/0.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.37/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.37/0.54  SPASS derived 127 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 152 clauses.
% 0.37/0.54  SPASS allocated 85750 KBytes.
% 0.37/0.54  SPASS spent	0:00:00.16 on the problem.
% 0.37/0.54  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.37/0.54  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.37/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.37/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.37/0.54  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.37/0.54  
% 0.37/0.54  
% 0.37/0.54  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 0.37/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.54  3[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n1,loopcounter)*r.
% 0.37/0.54  26[0:Inp] || leq(s_best7,n3)*r -> .
% 0.37/0.54  27[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(n0),n1)**.
% 0.37/0.54  61[0:Inp] || gt(loopcounter,n0) -> leq(s_best7,n3)*r.
% 0.37/0.54  88[0:Inp] || leq(succ(u),v)* -> gt(v,u).
% 0.37/0.54  156[0:MRR:61.1,26.0] || gt(loopcounter,n0)*r -> .
% 0.37/0.54  280[0:Res:88.1,156.0] || leq(succ(n0),loopcounter)*l -> .
% 0.37/0.54  285[0:Rew:27.0,280.0] || leq(n1,loopcounter)*r -> .
% 0.37/0.54  286[0:MRR:285.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.37/0.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.37/0.54  Formulae used in the proof : gauss_array_0012 successor_1 leq_succ_gt
% 0.37/0.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------