TSTP Solution File: SWV142+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV142+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:45:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.41s 2.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   23 (   2 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_166,plain,
    ( leq(s_best7,n3)
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ gt(loopcounter,n0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jc072h2b/input.p',i_0_166) ).

cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jc072h2b/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(s_best7,n3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jc072h2b/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_176,plain,
    ( leq(n1,loopcounter)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jc072h2b/input.p',i_0_176) ).

cnf(i_0_40,plain,
    ( gt(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(plus(X2,n1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jc072h2b/input.p',i_0_40) ).

cnf(i_0_140,plain,
    plus(n0,n1) = n1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jc072h2b/input.p',i_0_140) ).

cnf(c_0_183,plain,
    ( leq(s_best7,n3)
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ gt(loopcounter,n0) ),
    i_0_166 ).

cnf(c_0_184,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_185,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(s_best7,n3),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_186,plain,
    ( leq(n1,loopcounter)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    i_0_176 ).

cnf(c_0_187,plain,
    ~ gt(loopcounter,n0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_183,c_0_184])]),c_0_185]) ).

cnf(c_0_188,plain,
    ( gt(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(plus(X2,n1),X1) ),
    i_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_189,plain,
    plus(n0,n1) = n1,
    i_0_140 ).

cnf(c_0_190,plain,
    leq(n1,loopcounter),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_186,c_0_184])]) ).

cnf(c_0_191,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_188]),c_0_189]),c_0_190])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SWV142+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 14:27:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.49  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.41/2.64  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.41/2.64  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.41/2.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
% 8.41/2.64  
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof found!
% 8.41/2.64  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.41/2.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object total steps             : 15
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object clause steps            : 9
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object formula steps           : 6
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 8.41/2.64  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 8
% 8.41/2.64  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.41/2.64  # Parsed axioms                        : 200
% 8.41/2.64  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Initial clauses                      : 200
% 8.41/2.64  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 200
% 8.41/2.64  # Processed clauses                    : 45
% 8.41/2.64  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 8.41/2.64  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 8.41/2.64  # ...remaining for further processing  : 42
% 8.41/2.64  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Generated clauses                    : 71
% 8.41/2.64  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 61
% 8.41/2.64  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Paramodulations                      : 69
% 8.41/2.64  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 8.41/2.64  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Current number of processed clauses  : 42
% 8.41/2.64  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 27
% 8.41/2.64  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.41/2.64  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 8.41/2.64  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 8.41/2.64  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 216
% 8.41/2.64  # ...number of literals in the above   : 869
% 8.41/2.64  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 8.41/2.64  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 8.41/2.64  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 8.41/2.64  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 8.41/2.64  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.41/2.64  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7491
% 8.41/2.64  
% 8.41/2.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.41/2.64  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 8.41/2.64  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 8.41/2.64  # Total time               : 0.030 s
% 8.41/2.64  # ...preprocessing         : 0.028 s
% 8.41/2.64  # ...main loop             : 0.002 s
% 8.41/2.64  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 8.41/2.64  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------