TSTP Solution File: SWV139+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV139+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV139+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 20:15:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.51 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.51 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.51 SPASS derived 128 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 155 clauses.
% 0.19/0.51 SPASS allocated 85751 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.51 SPASS spent 0:00:00.16 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.51 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.51 0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.51 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.51 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.51 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.51 3[0:Inp] || -> leq(n1,loopcounter)*r.
% 0.19/0.51 26[0:Inp] || leq(n0,s_best7)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.51 27[0:Inp] || -> equal(succ(n0),n1)**.
% 0.19/0.51 58[0:Inp] || gt(loopcounter,n0) -> leq(n0,s_best7)*r.
% 0.19/0.51 88[0:Inp] || leq(succ(u),v)* -> gt(v,u).
% 0.19/0.51 156[0:MRR:58.1,26.0] || gt(loopcounter,n0)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.51 281[0:Res:88.1,156.0] || leq(succ(n0),loopcounter)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.51 285[0:Rew:27.0,281.0] || leq(n1,loopcounter)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.51 286[0:MRR:285.0,3.0] || -> .
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.51 Formulae used in the proof : gauss_array_0009 successor_1 leq_succ_gt
% 0.19/0.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------