%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV135+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV135+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 17:39:20 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.61/0.78  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.61/0.78  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.61/0.78  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.61/0.78  SPASS derived 2008 clauses, backtracked 18 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 734 clauses.
% 0.61/0.78  SPASS allocated 87367 KBytes.
% 0.61/0.78  SPASS spent	0:00:00.41 on the problem.
% 0.61/0.78  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.61/0.78  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.61/0.78  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.61/0.78  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.61/0.78  		0:00:00.20 for the reduction.
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.61/0.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.61/0.78  5[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n2,pv1325)*r.
% 0.61/0.78  20[0:Inp] ||  -> gt(n2,n0)*l.
% 0.61/0.78  32[0:Inp] || leq(n0,pv1325)*r -> .
% 0.61/0.78  69[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)* -> leq(v,u).
% 0.61/0.78  104[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* leq(v,w)* -> leq(u,w)*.
% 0.61/0.78  787[0:NCh:104.2,104.1,32.0,5.0] || leq(n0,n2)*r -> .
% 0.61/0.78  2956[0:Res:20.0,69.0] ||  -> leq(n0,n2)*r.
% 0.61/0.78  3072[0:MRR:2956.0,787.0] ||  -> .
% 0.61/0.78  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.61/0.78  Formulae used in the proof : gauss_array_0005 gt_2_0 leq_gt1 transitivity_leq
% 0.61/0.78  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------