%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV135+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:45:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.78s 2.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_168,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X3,X2)
    | ~ leq(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wavj_b_7/lgb.p',i_0_168) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wavj_b_7/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wavj_b_7/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(i_0_21,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wavj_b_7/lgb.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wavj_b_7/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(c_0_174,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X3,X2)
    | ~ leq(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_168 ).

cnf(c_0_175,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_176,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_177,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_178,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_179,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,pv1325)
    | ~ leq(X1,n2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_174,c_0_175]) ).

cnf(c_0_180,plain,
    leq(n0,n2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_176,c_0_177]) ).

cnf(c_0_181,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_178,c_0_179]),c_0_180])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV135+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 17:02:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.78/2.45  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.78/2.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.78/2.45  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.78/2.45  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.78/2.45  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.78/2.45  #
% 7.78/2.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.78/2.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.78/2.45  
% 7.78/2.45  # Proof found!
% 7.78/2.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.78/2.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.78/2.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.78/2.45  
% 7.78/2.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.78/2.45  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 7.78/2.45  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.78/2.45  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 7.78/2.45  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.78/2.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------