TSTP Solution File: SWV134+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:10:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.37s 7.67s
% Output   : Refutation 7.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:23:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.77/1.05  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.77/1.05  Process 16575 was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.77/1.05  Thu Jun 16 01:23:38 2022
% 0.77/1.05  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_16415_n009.cluster.edu".
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_16415_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.77/1.05  set(auto2).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.77/1.05      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.77/1.05      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.77/1.05      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.77/1.05  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.77/1.05  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.77/1.05  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.77/1.05  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.77/1.05  clear(print_given).
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (85 formulas)
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.77/1.05  1 (all X all Y (gt(X,Y) | gt(Y,X) | X = Y)) # label(totality) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  2 (all X all Y all Z (gt(X,Y) & gt(Y,Z) -> gt(X,Z))) # label(transitivity_gt) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  3 (all X -gt(X,X)) # label(irreflexivity_gt) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  4 (all X leq(X,X)) # label(reflexivity_leq) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  5 (all X all Y all Z (leq(X,Y) & leq(Y,Z) -> leq(X,Z))) # label(transitivity_leq) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  6 (all X all Y (lt(X,Y) <-> gt(Y,X))) # label(lt_gt) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  7 (all X all Y (geq(X,Y) <-> leq(Y,X))) # label(leq_geq) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  8 (all X all Y (gt(Y,X) -> leq(X,Y))) # label(leq_gt1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  9 (all X all Y (leq(X,Y) & X != Y -> gt(Y,X))) # label(leq_gt2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  10 (all X all Y (leq(X,pred(Y)) <-> gt(Y,X))) # label(leq_gt_pred) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  11 (all X gt(succ(X),X)) # label(gt_succ) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  12 (all X all Y (leq(X,Y) -> leq(X,succ(Y)))) # label(leq_succ) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  13 (all X all Y (leq(X,Y) <-> gt(succ(Y),X))) # label(leq_succ_gt_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  14 (all X all C (leq(n0,X) -> leq(uniform_int_rnd(C,X),X))) # label(uniform_int_rand_ranges_hi) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  15 (all X all C (leq(n0,X) -> leq(n0,uniform_int_rnd(C,X)))) # label(uniform_int_rand_ranges_lo) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  16 (all I all L all U all Val (leq(L,I) & leq(I,U) -> a_select2(tptp_const_array1(dim(L,U),Val),I) = Val)) # label(const_array1_select) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  17 (all I all L1 all U1 all J all L2 all U2 all Val (leq(L1,I) & leq(I,U1) & leq(L2,J) & leq(J,U2) -> a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(L1,U1),dim(L2,U2),Val),I,J) = Val)) # label(const_array2_select) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  18 (all A all N ((all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(A,I,J) = a_select3(A,J,I))) -> (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(trans(A),I,J) = a_select3(trans(A),J,I))))) # label(matrix_symm_trans) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  19 (all A all N ((all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(A,I,J) = a_select3(A,J,I))) -> (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(inv(A),I,J) = a_select3(inv(A),J,I))))) # label(matrix_symm_inv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  20 (all A all N ((all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(A,I,J) = a_select3(A,J,I))) -> (all I all J all K all VAL (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) & leq(n0,K) & leq(K,N) -> a_select3(tptp_update3(A,K,K,VAL),I,J) = a_select3(tptp_update3(A,K,K,VAL),J,I))))) # label(matrix_symm_update_diagonal) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  21 (all A all B all N ((all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(A,I,J) = a_select3(A,J,I))) & (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(B,I,J) = a_select3(B,J,I))) -> (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(tptp_madd(A,B),I,J) = a_select3(tptp_madd(A,B),J,I))))) # label(matrix_symm_add) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  22 (all A all B all N ((all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(A,I,J) = a_select3(A,J,I))) & (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(B,I,J) = a_select3(B,J,I))) -> (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(tptp_msub(A,B),I,J) = a_select3(tptp_msub(A,B),J,I))))) # label(matrix_symm_sub) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  23 (all A all B all N ((all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(B,I,J) = a_select3(B,J,I))) -> (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(tptp_mmul(A,tptp_mmul(B,trans(A))),I,J) = a_select3(tptp_mmul(A,tptp_mmul(B,trans(A))),J,I))))) # label(matrix_symm_aba1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  24 (all A all B all N all M ((all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,M) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,M) -> a_select3(B,I,J) = a_select3(B,J,I))) -> (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(tptp_mmul(A,tptp_mmul(B,trans(A))),I,J) = a_select3(tptp_mmul(A,tptp_mmul(B,trans(A))),J,I))))) # label(matrix_symm_aba2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  25 (all A all B all C all D all E all F all N all M ((all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,M) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,M) -> a_select3(D,I,J) = a_select3(D,J,I))) & (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(A,I,J) = a_select3(A,J,I))) & (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(F,I,J) = a_select3(F,J,I))) -> (all I all J (leq(n0,I) & leq(I,N) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,N) -> a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),I,J) = a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),J,I))))) # label(matrix_symm_joseph_update) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  26 (all Body sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,Body) = n0) # label(sum_plus_base) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  27 (all Body tptp_float_0_0 = sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,Body)) # label(sum_plus_base_float) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  28 (all X plus(X,n1) = succ(X)) # label(succ_plus_1_r) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  29 (all X plus(n1,X) = succ(X)) # label(succ_plus_1_l) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  30 (all X plus(X,n2) = succ(succ(X))) # label(succ_plus_2_r) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  31 (all X plus(n2,X) = succ(succ(X))) # label(succ_plus_2_l) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  32 (all X plus(X,n3) = succ(succ(succ(X)))) # label(succ_plus_3_r) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  33 (all X plus(n3,X) = succ(succ(succ(X)))) # label(succ_plus_3_l) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  34 (all X plus(X,n4) = succ(succ(succ(succ(X))))) # label(succ_plus_4_r) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  35 (all X plus(n4,X) = succ(succ(succ(succ(X))))) # label(succ_plus_4_l) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  36 (all X plus(X,n5) = succ(succ(succ(succ(succ(X)))))) # label(succ_plus_5_r) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  37 (all X plus(n5,X) = succ(succ(succ(succ(succ(X)))))) # label(succ_plus_5_l) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  38 (all X minus(X,n1) = pred(X)) # label(pred_minus_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  39 (all X pred(succ(X)) = X) # label(pred_succ) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  40 (all X succ(pred(X)) = X) # label(succ_pred) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  41 (all X all Y (leq(succ(X),succ(Y)) <-> leq(X,Y))) # label(leq_succ_succ) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  42 (all X all Y (leq(succ(X),Y) -> gt(Y,X))) # label(leq_succ_gt) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  43 (all X all Y (leq(minus(X,Y),X) -> leq(n0,Y))) # label(leq_minus) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  44 (all X all U all V all VAL a_select3(tptp_update3(X,U,V,VAL),U,V) = VAL) # label(sel3_update_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  45 (all I all J all U all V all X all VAL all VAL2 (I != U & J = V & a_select3(X,U,V) = VAL -> a_select3(tptp_update3(X,I,J,VAL2),U,V) = VAL)) # label(sel3_update_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  46 (all I all J all U all V all X all VAL ((all I0 all J0 (leq(n0,I0) & leq(n0,J0) & leq(I0,U) & leq(J0,V) -> a_select3(X,I0,J0) = VAL)) & leq(n0,I) & leq(I,U) & leq(n0,J) & leq(J,V) -> a_select3(tptp_update3(X,U,V,VAL),I,J) = VAL)) # label(sel3_update_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  47 (all X all U all VAL a_select2(tptp_update2(X,U,VAL),U) = VAL) # label(sel2_update_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  48 (all I all U all X all VAL all VAL2 (I != U & a_select2(X,U) = VAL -> a_select2(tptp_update2(X,I,VAL2),U) = VAL)) # label(sel2_update_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  49 (all I all U all X all VAL ((all I0 (leq(n0,I0) & leq(I0,U) -> a_select2(X,I0) = VAL)) & leq(n0,I) & leq(I,U) -> a_select2(tptp_update2(X,U,VAL),I) = VAL)) # label(sel2_update_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  50 (all X (leq(n0,X) & leq(X,n4) -> X = n0 | X = n1 | X = n2 | X = n3 | X = n4)) # label(finite_domain_4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  51 (all X (leq(n0,X) & leq(X,n5) -> X = n0 | X = n1 | X = n2 | X = n3 | X = n4 | X = n5)) # label(finite_domain_5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  52 (all X (leq(n0,X) & leq(X,n0) -> X = n0)) # label(finite_domain_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  53 (all X (leq(n0,X) & leq(X,n1) -> X = n0 | X = n1)) # label(finite_domain_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  54 (all X (leq(n0,X) & leq(X,n2) -> X = n0 | X = n1 | X = n2)) # label(finite_domain_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  55 (all X (leq(n0,X) & leq(X,n3) -> X = n0 | X = n1 | X = n2 | X = n3)) # label(finite_domain_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  56 -(-leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7)) & leq(n0,s_best7) & leq(n0,s_sworst7) & leq(n0,s_worst7) & leq(n2,pv1325) & leq(s_best7,n3) & leq(s_sworst7,n3) & leq(s_worst7,n3) & leq(pv1325,n3) & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7)) & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7)) -> leq(n0,pv1325)) # label(gauss_array_0004) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 7.37/7.67  57 lt(A,B) | -gt(B,A) # label(lt_gt) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 7.37/7.67  58 -lt(A,B) | gt(B,A) # label(lt_gt) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 7.37/7.67  59 geq(A,B) | -leq(B,A) # label(leq_geq) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 7.37/7.67  60 -geq(A,B) | leq(B,A) # label(leq_geq) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Term ordering decisions:
% 7.37/7.67  Function symbol KB weights:  n0=1. n3=1. n1=1. n2=1. n4=1. n5=1. tptp_minus_1=1. pv1325=1. s_values7=1. s_best7=1. s_sworst7=1. s_worst7=1. tptp_float_0_0=1. def=1. use=1. tptp_mmul=1. tptp_madd=1. tptp_msub=1. a_select2=1. plus=1. dim=1. minus=1. uniform_int_rnd=1. tptp_const_array1=1. f1=1. f2=1. f3=1. f4=1. f5=1. f6=1. trans=1. succ=1. inv=1. pred=1. a_select3=1. tptp_update2=1. sum=1. tptp_const_array2=1. f7=1. f8=1. f9=1. f10=1. f11=1. f12=1. f13=1. f14=1. f15=1. f16=1. tptp_update3=1. f17=1. f18=1. f27=1. f25=1. f26=1. f19=1. f20=1. f21=1. f22=1. f23=1. f24=1.
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  % Starting search at 0.25 seconds.
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 1208 (0.00 of 1.32 sec).
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=143.000, iters=3348
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=140.000, iters=3336
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=119.000, iters=3594
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=113.000, iters=3486
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=89.000, iters=3473
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=86.000, iters=3457
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=80.000, iters=3345
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=58.000, iters=3346
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=55.000, iters=3428
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=50.000, iters=3396
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=49.000, iters=3380
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=47.000, iters=3478
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=46.000, iters=3474
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=44.000, iters=3601
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=40.000, iters=3453
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=3271, wt=179.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=10901, wt=34.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=10908, wt=25.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=34.000, iters=3368
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=11069, wt=22.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=11843, wt=19.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=31.000, iters=3373
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=30.000, iters=3345
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=29.000, iters=3341
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=28.000, iters=3361
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=26.000, iters=3391
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=16091, wt=16.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3395
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=16291, wt=14.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=17294, wt=13.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=17645, wt=11.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=17765, wt=10.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=18144, wt=7.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=24.000, iters=3355
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=23.000, iters=3362
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3341
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=20359, wt=6.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (displace): id=22057, wt=5.000
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3350
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3338
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 7.37/7.67  % SZS status Theorem
% 7.37/7.67  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  % Proof 1 at 6.52 (+ 0.12) seconds.
% 7.37/7.67  % Length of proof is 13.
% 7.37/7.67  % Level of proof is 4.
% 7.37/7.67  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 7.37/7.67  % Given clauses 1284.
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  2 (all X all Y all Z (gt(X,Y) & gt(Y,Z) -> gt(X,Z))) # label(transitivity_gt) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 7.37/7.67  13 (all X all Y (leq(X,Y) <-> gt(succ(Y),X))) # label(leq_succ_gt_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 7.37/7.67  56 -(-leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7)) & leq(n0,s_best7) & leq(n0,s_sworst7) & leq(n0,s_worst7) & leq(n2,pv1325) & leq(s_best7,n3) & leq(s_sworst7,n3) & leq(s_worst7,n3) & leq(pv1325,n3) & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7)) & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7)) -> leq(n0,pv1325)) # label(gauss_array_0004) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 7.37/7.67  62 -gt(A,B) | -gt(B,C) | gt(A,C) # label(transitivity_gt) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 7.37/7.67  72 -leq(A,B) | gt(succ(B),A) # label(leq_succ_gt_equiv) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
% 7.37/7.67  73 leq(A,B) | -gt(succ(B),A) # label(leq_succ_gt_equiv) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
% 7.37/7.67  332 gt(n2,n0) # label(gt_2_0) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 7.37/7.67  362 leq(n2,pv1325) # label(gauss_array_0004) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(56)].
% 7.37/7.67  369 -leq(n0,pv1325) # label(gauss_array_0004) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(56)].
% 7.37/7.67  1675 -gt(A,n2) | gt(A,n0).  [resolve(332,a,62,b)].
% 7.37/7.67  4214 gt(succ(pv1325),n2).  [resolve(362,a,72,a)].
% 7.37/7.67  28046 gt(succ(pv1325),n0).  [resolve(1675,a,4214,a)].
% 7.37/7.67  28051 $F.  [resolve(28046,a,73,b),unit_del(a,369)].
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Given=1284. Generated=195517. Kept=27976. proofs=1.
% 7.37/7.67  Usable=1247. Sos=9999. Demods=780. Limbo=2, Disabled=17027. Hints=0.
% 7.37/7.67  Megabytes=31.87.
% 7.37/7.67  User_CPU=6.52, System_CPU=0.12, Wall_clock=7.
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  ============================== end of search =========================
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  THEOREM PROVED
% 7.37/7.67  % SZS status Theorem
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 7.37/7.67  
% 7.37/7.67  Process 16575 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 01:23:45 2022
% 7.37/7.67  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------