%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:45:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.70s 2.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_171,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X3,X2)
    | ~ leq(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l8c8gike/lgb.p',i_0_171) ).

cnf(i_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l8c8gike/lgb.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_44,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l8c8gike/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l8c8gike/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).

cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l8c8gike/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(c_0_177,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X3,X2)
    | ~ leq(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_171 ).

cnf(c_0_178,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_179,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_180,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    i_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_181,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_182,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,pv1325)
    | ~ leq(X1,n2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_177,c_0_178]) ).

cnf(c_0_183,plain,
    leq(n0,n2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_179,c_0_180]) ).

cnf(c_0_184,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_181,c_0_182]),c_0_183])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:40:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.70/2.40  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.70/2.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.70/2.40  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.70/2.40  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.70/2.40  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.70/2.40  #
% 7.70/2.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.70/2.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.70/2.40  
% 7.70/2.40  # Proof found!
% 7.70/2.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.70/2.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.70/2.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.70/2.40  
% 7.70/2.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.70/2.40  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 7.70/2.40  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.70/2.40  # Total time               : 0.035 s
% 7.70/2.40  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.70/2.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------