TSTP Solution File: SWV132+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SWV132+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:50:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.44s 2.69s
% Output : Proof 2.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWV132+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 05:34:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.44/2.69 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.44/2.69 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.44/2.69 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.44/2.69 % SZS output start Proof
% 2.44/2.69 1. (-. (gt (succ (pv1341)) (tptp_float_0_001))) (gt (succ (pv1341)) (tptp_float_0_001)) ### Axiom
% 2.44/2.69 2. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341)) (-. (gt (succ (pv1341)) (tptp_float_0_001))) ### Definition-Pseudo(leq) 1
% 2.44/2.69 3. (-. (-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341)))) (-. (gt (succ (pv1341)) (tptp_float_0_001))) ### NotNot 2
% 2.44/2.69 4. (-. (gt (succ (n3)) (s_best7))) (gt (succ (n3)) (s_best7)) ### Axiom
% 2.44/2.69 5. (leq (s_best7) (n3)) (-. (gt (succ (n3)) (s_best7))) ### Definition-Pseudo(leq) 4
% 2.44/2.69 6. ((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (s_best7) (n3))) (-. (gt (succ (n3)) (s_best7))) (-. (gt (succ (pv1341)) (tptp_float_0_001))) ### Imply 3 5
% 2.44/2.69 7. (-. (leq (s_best7) (n3))) (-. (gt (succ (pv1341)) (tptp_float_0_001))) ((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (s_best7) (n3))) ### Definition-Pseudo(leq) 6
% 2.44/2.69 8. (-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) ((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (s_best7) (n3))) (-. (leq (s_best7) (n3))) ### Definition-Pseudo(leq) 7
% 2.44/2.69 9. (-. (((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) /\ (((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (n0) (s_best7))) /\ (((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (n0) (s_sworst7))) /\ (((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (n0) (s_worst7))) /\ (((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (s_best7) (n3))) /\ (((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (s_sworst7) (n3))) /\ (((-. (leq (tptp_float_0_001) (pv1341))) => (leq (s_worst7) (n3))) /\ (((gt (loopcounter) (n0)) => (leq (n0) (s_best7))) /\ (((gt (loopcounter) (n0)) => (leq (n0) (s_sworst7))) /\ (((gt (loopcounter) (n0)) => (leq (n0) (s_worst7))) /\ (((gt (loopcounter) (n0)) => (leq (s_best7) (n3))) /\ (((gt (loopcounter) (n0)) => (leq (s_sworst7) (n3))) /\ ((gt (loopcounter) (n0)) => (leq (s_worst7) (n3))))))))))))))) => (leq (s_best7) (n3)))) ### ConjTree 8
% 2.44/2.69 % SZS output end Proof
% 2.44/2.69 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------