TSTP Solution File: SWV132+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWV132+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:45:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.72s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_176,plain,
( ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-en4hhwyh/input.p',i_0_176) ).
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-en4hhwyh/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_172,plain,
( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(s_best7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-en4hhwyh/input.p',i_0_172) ).
cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(s_best7,n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-en4hhwyh/input.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(c_0_181,plain,
( ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341) ),
i_0_176 ).
cnf(c_0_182,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_183,plain,
( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(s_best7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_172 ).
cnf(c_0_184,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(s_best7,n3),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_185,plain,
~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_181,c_0_182])]) ).
cnf(c_0_186,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_183,c_0_182])]),c_0_184]),c_0_185]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV132+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 05:34:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.72/2.42 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.72/2.42 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.72/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.72/2.42
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof found!
% 7.72/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.72/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 7.72/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.72/2.42 # Parsed axioms : 199
% 7.72/2.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Initial clauses : 199
% 7.72/2.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 199
% 7.72/2.42 # Processed clauses : 34
% 7.72/2.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 7.72/2.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Generated clauses : 51
% 7.72/2.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 47
% 7.72/2.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Paramodulations : 49
% 7.72/2.42 # Factorizations : 2
% 7.72/2.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 7.72/2.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 7.72/2.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 7.72/2.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 7.72/2.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 212
% 7.72/2.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 865
% 7.72/2.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 7.72/2.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 7.72/2.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 7.72/2.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 7.72/2.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.72/2.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7289
% 7.72/2.42
% 7.72/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.72/2.42 # User time : 0.016 s
% 7.72/2.42 # System time : 0.008 s
% 7.72/2.42 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 7.72/2.42 # ...preprocessing : 0.023 s
% 7.72/2.42 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 7.72/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.72/2.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------