TSTP Solution File: SWV132+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV132+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 129 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 38 ( 10 avg)
% Number of connectives : 165 ( 48 ~; 28 |; 49 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 39 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 8 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(gauss_array_0002,conjecture,
( ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_best7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_sworst7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_worst7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_best7,n3) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_sworst7,n3) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_worst7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_best7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_sworst7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_worst7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_best7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_sworst7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_worst7,n3) ) )
=> leq(s_best7,n3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wLJIbhuo7V/E---3.1_10652.p',gauss_array_0002) ).
fof(c_0_1,plain,
( epred1_0
<=> ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_best7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_sworst7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_worst7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_best7,n3) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_sworst7,n3) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_worst7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_best7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_sworst7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_worst7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_best7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_sworst7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_worst7,n3) ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
( epred1_0
=> ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_best7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_sworst7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(n0,s_worst7) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_best7,n3) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_sworst7,n3) )
& ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
=> leq(s_worst7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_best7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_sworst7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(n0,s_worst7) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_best7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_sworst7,n3) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
=> leq(s_worst7,n3) ) ) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
=> leq(s_best7,n3) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[gauss_array_0002])]),c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( ( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(n0,s_best7)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(n0,s_sworst7)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(n0,s_worst7)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(s_best7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(s_sworst7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(s_worst7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n0)
| leq(n0,s_best7)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n0)
| leq(n0,s_sworst7)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n0)
| leq(n0,s_worst7)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n0)
| leq(s_best7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n0)
| leq(s_sworst7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n0)
| leq(s_worst7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
& ~ leq(s_best7,n3) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341)
| leq(s_best7,n3)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
~ leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv1341),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(s_best7,n3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7])]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWV132+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:38:21 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wLJIbhuo7V/E---3.1_10652.p
% 0.16/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # new_bool_3 with pid 10730 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with pid 10733 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 29
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses : 72
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 72
% 0.16/0.44 # Processed clauses : 24
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.16/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 18
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 48
% 0.16/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 109
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3418
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1928 pages
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.16/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------