TSTP Solution File: SWV128+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV128+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 04:02:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.59s 0.81s
% Output : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 124 ( 35 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 13 avg)
% Number of connectives : 152 ( 37 ~; 32 |; 65 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 18 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 8 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 14 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 40 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f139,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f120,f114]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
~ true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,plain,
( ~ true
& ! [X0,X1] :
( use = a_select3(z_defuse,X0,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(X0,minus(m_measvars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(n0,X0) )
& ! [X2] :
( use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X2) )
& ! [X3] :
( use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X3)
| ~ leq(X3,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X3) )
& ! [X4,X5] :
( use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X4,X5)
| ~ leq(X5,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(X4,n7)
| ~ leq(n0,X5)
| ~ leq(n0,X4) )
& ! [X6,X7] :
( use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X6,X7)
| ~ leq(X7,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(X6,minus(m_measvars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X7)
| ~ leq(n0,X6) )
& use = tvar_defuse
& use = t_defuse ),
inference(flattening,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
( ~ true
& ! [X0,X1] :
( use = a_select3(z_defuse,X0,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(X0,minus(m_measvars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(n0,X0) )
& ! [X2] :
( use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X2) )
& ! [X3] :
( use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X3)
| ~ leq(X3,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X3) )
& ! [X4,X5] :
( use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X4,X5)
| ~ leq(X5,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(X4,n7)
| ~ leq(n0,X5)
| ~ leq(n0,X4) )
& ! [X6,X7] :
( use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X6,X7)
| ~ leq(X7,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(X6,minus(m_measvars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X7)
| ~ leq(n0,X6) )
& use = tvar_defuse
& use = t_defuse ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
~ ( ( ! [X0,X1] :
( ( leq(X1,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X0,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X1)
& leq(n0,X0) )
=> use = a_select3(z_defuse,X0,X1) )
& ! [X2] :
( ( leq(X2,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X2) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X2) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( leq(X3,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X3) )
& ! [X4,X5] :
( ( leq(X5,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X4,n7)
& leq(n0,X5)
& leq(n0,X4) )
=> use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X4,X5) )
& ! [X6,X7] :
( ( leq(X7,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X6,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X7)
& leq(n0,X6) )
=> use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X6,X7) )
& use = tvar_defuse
& use = t_defuse )
=> true ),
inference(rectify,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X27,X28] :
( ( leq(X28,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X27,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X28)
& leq(n0,X27) )
=> use = a_select3(z_defuse,X27,X28) )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X21) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X21) )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(X20,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X20) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X20) )
& ! [X3,X19] :
( ( leq(X19,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X3,n7)
& leq(n0,X19)
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X3,X19) )
& ! [X13,X17] :
( ( leq(X17,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X13,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X17)
& leq(n0,X13) )
=> use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X13,X17) )
& use = tvar_defuse
& use = t_defuse )
=> true ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( ! [X27,X28] :
( ( leq(X28,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X27,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X28)
& leq(n0,X27) )
=> use = a_select3(z_defuse,X27,X28) )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X21) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X21) )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(X20,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X20) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X20) )
& ! [X3,X19] :
( ( leq(X19,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X3,n7)
& leq(n0,X19)
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X3,X19) )
& ! [X13,X17] :
( ( leq(X17,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X13,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X17)
& leq(n0,X13) )
=> use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X13,X17) )
& use = tvar_defuse
& use = t_defuse )
=> true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zt3ddUTK9o/Vampire---4.8_2880',thruster_inuse_0001) ).
fof(f120,plain,
true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
fof(f51,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zt3ddUTK9o/Vampire---4.8_2880',ttrue) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWV128+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:26:56 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.32 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.11/0.32 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zt3ddUTK9o/Vampire---4.8_2880
% 0.59/0.80 % (2993)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.59/0.80 % (2995)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.59/0.80 % (2991)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.59/0.80 % (2996)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.59/0.80 % (2994)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.59/0.80 % (2992)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.59/0.80 % (2997)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.59/0.80 % (2998)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)First to succeed.
% 0.59/0.81 % (2993)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.59/0.81 % (2998)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.59/0.81 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.59/0.81 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)Memory used [KB]: 1093
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.81 % (2994)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.81 % (2990)Success in time 0.481 s
% 0.59/0.81 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------