TSTP Solution File: SWV128+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWV128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 148 ( 42 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 14 avg)
% Number of connectives : 192 ( 54 ~; 48 |; 72 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 18 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 9 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 14 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 48 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f467,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f382,f333]) ).
fof(f333,plain,
~ true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f219]) ).
fof(f219,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ leq(X0,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X0) )
& ~ true
& use = tvar_defuse
& ! [X1,X2] :
( ~ leq(X1,minus(n_steps,n1))
| use = a_select3(z_defuse,X2,X1)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(X2,minus(m_measvars,n1)) )
& ! [X3,X4] :
( ~ leq(n0,X4)
| use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X4,X3)
| ~ leq(n0,X3)
| ~ leq(X4,minus(m_measvars,n1))
| ~ leq(X3,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
& use = t_defuse
& ! [X5] :
( ~ leq(X5,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X5)
| use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X5) )
& ! [X6,X7] :
( use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X7,X6)
| ~ leq(n0,X6)
| ~ leq(n0,X7)
| ~ leq(X7,n7)
| ~ leq(X6,minus(n_steps,n1)) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f134]) ).
fof(f134,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ leq(X0,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X0) )
& ~ true
& use = tvar_defuse
& ! [X4,X3] :
( ~ leq(X4,minus(n_steps,n1))
| use = a_select3(z_defuse,X3,X4)
| ~ leq(n0,X3)
| ~ leq(n0,X4)
| ~ leq(X3,minus(m_measvars,n1)) )
& ! [X7,X6] :
( ~ leq(n0,X6)
| use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X6,X7)
| ~ leq(n0,X7)
| ~ leq(X6,minus(m_measvars,n1))
| ~ leq(X7,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
& use = t_defuse
& ! [X5] :
( ~ leq(X5,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X5)
| use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X5) )
& ! [X2,X1] :
( use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X1,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(X1,n7)
| ~ leq(X2,minus(n_steps,n1)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f133]) ).
fof(f133,plain,
( ~ true
& ! [X6,X7] :
( use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X6,X7)
| ~ leq(n0,X6)
| ~ leq(X7,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(X6,minus(m_measvars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X7) )
& ! [X2,X1] :
( use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X1,X2)
| ~ leq(X2,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| ~ leq(X1,n7) )
& ! [X0] :
( use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X0)
| ~ leq(X0,minus(n_statevars,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X0) )
& use = t_defuse
& ! [X5] :
( use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X5)
| ~ leq(n0,X5)
| ~ leq(X5,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
& use = tvar_defuse
& ! [X4,X3] :
( use = a_select3(z_defuse,X3,X4)
| ~ leq(X3,minus(m_measvars,n1))
| ~ leq(X4,minus(n_steps,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,X3)
| ~ leq(n0,X4) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
~ ( ( ! [X6,X7] :
( ( leq(n0,X6)
& leq(X7,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(X6,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X7) )
=> use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X6,X7) )
& ! [X2,X1] :
( ( leq(X2,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(n0,X1)
& leq(n0,X2)
& leq(X1,n7) )
=> use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X1,X2) )
& ! [X0] :
( ( leq(X0,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X0) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X0) )
& use = t_defuse
& ! [X5] :
( ( leq(n0,X5)
& leq(X5,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X5) )
& use = tvar_defuse
& ! [X4,X3] :
( ( leq(X3,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(X4,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(n0,X3)
& leq(n0,X4) )
=> use = a_select3(z_defuse,X3,X4) ) )
=> true ),
inference(rectify,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( use = tvar_defuse
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X21) )
& ! [X3,X19] :
( ( leq(X3,n7)
& leq(n0,X19)
& leq(n0,X3)
& leq(X19,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X3,X19) )
& ! [X27,X28] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(X27,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(X28,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(n0,X27) )
=> use = a_select3(z_defuse,X27,X28) )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(X20,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X20) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X20) )
& ! [X13,X17] :
( ( leq(n0,X17)
& leq(X13,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X13)
& leq(X17,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X13,X17) )
& use = t_defuse )
=> true ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( use = tvar_defuse
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X21) )
& ! [X3,X19] :
( ( leq(X3,n7)
& leq(n0,X19)
& leq(n0,X3)
& leq(X19,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> use = a_select3(tr_defuse,X3,X19) )
& ! [X27,X28] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(X27,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(X28,minus(n_steps,n1))
& leq(n0,X27) )
=> use = a_select3(z_defuse,X27,X28) )
& ! [X20] :
( ( leq(X20,minus(n_statevars,n1))
& leq(n0,X20) )
=> use = a_select2(xinit_defuse,X20) )
& ! [X13,X17] :
( ( leq(n0,X17)
& leq(X13,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(n0,X13)
& leq(X17,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> use = a_select3(rho_defuse,X13,X17) )
& use = t_defuse )
=> true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thruster_inuse_0001) ).
fof(f382,plain,
true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
fof(f51,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ttrue) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWV128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:14:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.50 % (17137)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (17149)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 % (17166)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 % (17140)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.53 % (17141)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 % (17144)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (17149)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (17136)Success in time 0.187 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------